Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorHelmerhorst, Henrik J. F.
dc.contributor.authorBrage, Søren
dc.contributor.authorWarren, Janet
dc.contributor.authorBesson, Herve
dc.contributor.authorEkelund, Ulf
dc.date.accessioned2012-11-14T12:58:31Z
dc.date.available2012-11-14T12:58:31Z
dc.date.issued2012-08-31
dc.identifierSeksjon for idrettsmedisinske fag / Department of Sports Medicine
dc.identifier.citationInternational Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity. 2012, 9, 103no_NO
dc.identifier.issn1479-5868
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11250/170980
dc.description© 2012 Helmerhorst et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.no_NO
dc.description.abstractPhysical inactivity is one of the four leading risk factors for global mortality. Accurate measurement of physical activity (PA) and in particular by physical activity questionnaires (PAQs) remains a challenge. The aim of this paper is to provide an updated systematic review of the reliability and validity characteristics of existing and more recently developed PAQs and to quantitatively compare the performance between existing and newly developed PAQs. A literature search of electronic databases was performed for studies assessing reliability and validity data of PAQs using an objective criterion measurement of PA between January 1997 and December 2011. Articles meeting the inclusion criteria were screened and data were extracted to provide a systematic overview of measurement properties. Due to differences in reported outcomes and criterion methods a quantitative meta-analysis was not possible. In total, 31 studies testing 34 newly developed PAQs, and 65 studies examining 96 existing PAQs were included. Very few PAQs showed good results on both reliability and validity. Median reliability correlation coefficients were 0.62–0.71 for existing, and 0.74–0.76 for new PAQs. Median validity coefficients ranged from 0.30–0.39 for existing, and from 0.25–0.41 for new PAQs. Although the majority of PAQs appear to have acceptable reliability, the validity is moderate at best. Newly developed PAQs do not appear to perform substantially better than existing PAQs in terms of reliability and validity. Future PAQ studies should include measures of absolute validity and the error structure of the instrument.no_NO
dc.language.isoengno_NO
dc.publisherBioMed Centralno_NO
dc.subjectsystematic reviewno_NO
dc.subjectphysical activityno_NO
dc.subjectself-reportno_NO
dc.subjectaccelerometryno_NO
dc.subjectvalidityno_NO
dc.subjectreliabilityno_NO
dc.titleA systematic review of reliability and objective criterion-related validity of physical activity questionnairesno_NO
dc.typeJournal articleno_NO
dc.typePeer reviewedno_NO
dc.subject.nsiVDP::Social science: 200::Social science in sports: 330no_NO
dc.subject.nsiVDP::Medical disciplines: 700::Sports medicine: 850no_NO
dc.source.pagenumber103no_NO
dc.source.volume9no_NO
dc.source.journalInternational Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activityno_NO


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel