Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorKristiansen, Elsa
dc.contributor.authorHoulihan, Barrie
dc.date.accessioned2016-09-05T11:44:28Z
dc.date.available2016-09-05T11:44:28Z
dc.date.issued2015-09-30
dc.identifier.citationInternational Review for the Sociology of Sport. 2015, 1-23nb_NO
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11250/2404303
dc.descriptionDette er siste tekst-versjon av artikkelen, og den kan inneholde små forskjeller fra forlagets pdf-versjon. Forlagets pdf-versjon finner du på www.humankinetics.com / This is the final text version of the article, and it may contain minor differences from the journal's pdf version. The original publication is available at www.humankinetics.comnb_NO
dc.description.abstractThe aim of the paper is to analyse the increasingly prominent role of private sports schools in the development of elite athletes in Norway. The context for the analysis is the apparent paradox between the emergence of a network of sports schools, the most successful of which are private and require that parents pay a fee, and the social democratic values of Norway. Data were collected through a series of interviews with 35 respondents from nine stakeholder groups, including athletes, coaches, parents and sport school managers. The research describes an elite sport system that is successful in producing medal winning athletes, but which is organizationally fragmented, uncoordinated and under-funded with regard to youth talent identification and development and susceptible to tensions between key actors. The primary analytical framework is Kingdon’s multiple streams framework augmented by path dependency theory. The findings include, a picture of an elite youth sport development system in which multiple and overlapping problems have received, at best, only partial policy solutions some of which, such as the growth of private sports schools, have emerged by default. When focusing attention on the relationship between structure and agency in the policy process it is argued that the government, through its inaction, has allowed sports schools the policy space to expand. The consequence is that the government has, whether deliberately or not, enabled the strengthening of a commercial elite youth sport development system, while still preserving its egalitarian and non-interventionist credentials.nb_NO
dc.language.isoengnb_NO
dc.publisherSAGEnb_NO
dc.subjectelite sport schoolsnb_NO
dc.subjectnorwaynb_NO
dc.subjectsport policynb_NO
dc.subjectyouth talent developmentnb_NO
dc.subjectmultiple streamsnb_NO
dc.subjectpath dependencynb_NO
dc.titleDeveloping young athletes: the role of private sport schools in the Norwegian sport systemnb_NO
dc.typeJournal articlenb_NO
dc.typePeer reviewednb_NO
dc.subject.nsiVDP::Social science: 200::Social science in sports: 330::Other subjects within physical education: 339nb_NO
dc.source.journalInternational Review for the Sociology of Sportnb_NO
dc.identifier.doi10.1177/1012690215607082
dc.description.localcodeSeksjon for kultur og samfunn / Department of Cultural and Social Studiesnb_NO


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel