Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorDunlop, Gordon
dc.contributor.authorArdern, Clare L.
dc.contributor.authorAndersen, Thor Einar
dc.contributor.authorLewin, Colin
dc.contributor.authorDupont, Gregory
dc.contributor.authorAshworth, Ben
dc.contributor.authorO'Driscoll, Gary
dc.contributor.authorRolls, Andrew
dc.contributor.authorBrown, Susan
dc.contributor.authorMcCall, Alan
dc.date.accessioned2020-05-12T08:46:25Z
dc.date.available2020-05-12T08:46:25Z
dc.date.created2020-01-28T10:54:27Z
dc.date.issued2019
dc.identifier.citationSports Medicine. 2019, 50(4), 829–840.en_US
dc.identifier.issn0112-1642
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11250/2654014
dc.descriptionThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativeco mmons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.en_US
dc.description.abstractPurpose: Return-to-play (RTP) is an on-going challenge in professional football. Return-to-play related research is increasing. However, it is unknown to what extent the recommendations presented within research are being implemented by professional football teams, and where there are gaps between research and practice. The purposes of this study were (1) to determine if premier-league football teams worldwide follow a RTP continuum, (2) to identify RTP criteria used and (3) to understand how RTP decision-making occurs in applied practice. Methods: We sent a structured online survey to practitioners responsible for the RTP programme in 310 professional teams from 34 premier-leagues worldwide. The survey comprised four sections, based on hamstring muscle injury: (1) criteria used throughout RTP phases, (2) the frequency with which progression criteria were achieved, (3) RTP decision-making process and (4) challenges to decision-making. Results: One-hundred and thirty-one teams responded with a completed survey (42%). One-hundred and twenty-four teams (95%) used a continuum to guide RTP, assessing a combination of clinical, functional and psychological criteria to inform decisions to progress. One-hundred and five (80%) teams reported using a shared decision-making approach considering the input of multiple stakeholders. Team hierarchy, match- and player-related factors were common challenges perceived to influence decision-making. Conclusions: General research recommendations for RTP and the beliefs and practices of practitioners appear to match with, the majority of teams assessing functional, clinical and psychological criteria throughout a RTP continuum to inform decision-making which is also shared among key stakeholders. However, specific criteria, metrics and thresholds used, and the specific involvement, dynamics and interactions of staff during decision-making are not clear.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.subjectprofessional footballen_US
dc.subjectpsychological readinessen_US
dc.subjectprevention strategiesen_US
dc.subjectrisk factorsen_US
dc.subjectre-injuryen_US
dc.subjectsporten_US
dc.subjectcriteriaen_US
dc.subjectsocceren_US
dc.subjectrehabilitationen_US
dc.subjectperceptionsen_US
dc.titleReturn-to-Play Practices Following Hamstring Injury: A Worldwide Survey of 131 Premier League Football Teamsen_US
dc.typePeer revieweden_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.description.versionpublishedVersionen_US
dc.source.pagenumber829–840en_US
dc.source.journalSports Medicineen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s40279-019-01199-2
dc.identifier.cristin1783829
dc.description.localcodeSeksjon for idrettsmedisinske fag / Department of Sports Medicineen_US
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.qualitycode1


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel