dc.contributor.author | Haugen, Tommy | |
dc.contributor.author | Peters, Derek Melville | |
dc.contributor.author | Ommundsen, Yngvar | |
dc.contributor.author | Martin, Luc J. | |
dc.contributor.author | Stenling, Andreas | |
dc.contributor.author | Høigaard, Rune | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-11T14:12:37Z | |
dc.date.available | 2021-06-11T14:12:37Z | |
dc.date.created | 2021-05-05T10:31:24Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2021 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Measurement in Physical Education and Exercise Science. 2021, Artikkel 1917414. | en_US |
dc.identifier.issn | 1091-367X | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/11250/2759028 | |
dc.description | This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, and is not altered, transformed, or built upon in any way. | en_US |
dc.description.abstract | This study aimed to translate the modified Group Environment Questionnaire (GEQ) and the Youth Sport Environment Questionnaire (YSEQ) into Norwegian, examine the factor structure and reliability of the scales through independent clusters model confirmatory factor analysis (ICM-CFA) and exploratory structural equation modeling (ESEM), and examine differential item functioning (DIF) as a function of sex. Three-hundred-and-thirty-three athletes (M(SD)age = 18.7(2.60) years; 33% females) completed the GEQ. Three-hundred-and-three athletes (M(SD)age = 15.0(1.48) years; 26% females) completed the YSEQ. Results indicated acceptable fit indices for a four-factor, a second-order two-factor (task and social), and a second order one-factor ESEM model for the GEQ. Cross-loadings and high latent factor correlations are issues in need of attention. The study supported the structural validity and reliability of the Norwegian YSEQ, with no major differences between the ICM-CFA and ESEM. No evidence of DIF as a function of sex was identified in either of the scales. | en_US |
dc.language.iso | eng | en_US |
dc.subject | group dynamics | en_US |
dc.subject | psychometrics | en_US |
dc.subject | team cohesion | en_US |
dc.subject | team sports | en_US |
dc.subject | validation | en_US |
dc.title | Psychometric evaluation of the Norwegian versions of the modified Group Environment Questionnaire and the Youth Sport Environment Questionnaire | en_US |
dc.type | Peer reviewed | en_US |
dc.type | Journal article | en_US |
dc.description.version | publishedVersion | en_US |
dc.rights.holder | © 2021 The Author(s) | en_US |
dc.source.pagenumber | 14 | en_US |
dc.source.journal | Measurement in Physical Education and Exercise Science | en_US |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1080/1091367X.2021.1917414 | |
dc.identifier.cristin | 1908149 | |
dc.description.localcode | Institutt for idrett og samfunnsvitenskap / Department of Sport and Social Sciences | en_US |
dc.source.articlenumber | 1917414 | en_US |
cristin.ispublished | true | |
cristin.fulltext | original | |
cristin.qualitycode | 1 | |