Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorDahl, Even B.
dc.contributor.authorØygard, Eivind
dc.contributor.authorPaulsen, Gøran
dc.contributor.authorRud, Bjarne
dc.contributor.authorLosnegard, Thomas Johansen
dc.date.accessioned2021-11-23T08:15:39Z
dc.date.available2021-11-23T08:15:39Z
dc.date.created2021-09-06T08:55:38Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.identifier.citationInternational Journal of Sports Physiology and Performance (IJSPP). 2021, under utgivelse.en_US
dc.identifier.issn1555-0265
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11250/2830867
dc.descriptionDette er siste tekst-versjon av artikkelen, og den kan inneholde små forskjeller fra forlagets pdf-versjon. Forlagets pdf-versjon finner du her: https://doi.org/10.1123/ijspp.2020-0747 / This is the final text version of the article, and it may contain minor differences from the journal's pdf version. The original publication is available here: https://doi.org/10.1123/ijspp.2020-0747en_US
dc.description.abstractPurpose: Preconditioning exercise is a widely used strategy believed to enhance performance later the same day. The authors examined the influence of preconditioning exercises 6 hours prior to a time-to-exhaustion (TTE) test during treadmill running. Methods: Ten male competitive runners (age = 26 [3] y, height = 184 [8] cm, weight = 73 [9] kg, maximum oxygen consumption = 72 [7] mL·kg−1·min−1) did a preconditioning session of running (RUN) or resistance exercise (RES) or no morning exercise (NoEx) in a randomized order, separated by >72 hours. The RUN consisted of 15 minutes of low-intensity running and 4 × 15 seconds at race pace (21–24 km·h−1) on a treadmill; RES involved 5 minutes of low-intensity running and 2 × 3 repetitions of isokinetic 1-leg shallow squats with maximal mobilization. Following a 6-hour break, electrically evoked force (m. vastus medialis), countermovement jump, running economy, and a TTE of approximately 2 minutes were examined. Results: Relative to NoEx, no difference was seen for RUN or RES in TTE (mean ± 95% CI: −1.3% ± 3.4% and −0.5% ± 6.0%) or running economy (0.2% ± 1.6% and 1.9% ± 2.7%; all Ps > .05). Jump height was not different for the RUN condition (1.0% ± 2.7%]) but tended to be higher in RES than in the NoEx condition (1.5% ± 1.6%, P = .07). The electrically evoked force tended to reveal low-frequency fatigue (reduced 20:50-Hz peak force ratio) only after RES compared to NoEx (−4.5% ± 4.6%, P = .06). Conclusion: The RUN or RES 6 hours prior to approximately 2 minutes of TTE running test did not improve performance in competitive runners.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.subjectenduranceen_US
dc.subjectmorning exerciseen_US
dc.subjectrunning economyen_US
dc.subjectstrength trainingen_US
dc.subjectprior exerciseen_US
dc.subjectwarm-upen_US
dc.titleMorning Preconditioning Exercise Does Not Increase Afternoon Performance in Competitive Runnersen_US
dc.typePeer revieweden_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.description.versionacceptedVersionen_US
dc.source.pagenumber8en_US
dc.source.journalInternational Journal of Sports Physiology and Performance (IJSPP)en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1123/ijspp.2020-0747
dc.identifier.cristin1931444
dc.description.localcodeInstitutt for fysisk prestasjonsevne / Department of Physical Performanceen_US
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextpostprint
cristin.qualitycode1


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel