Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorGonjo, Tomohiro
dc.contributor.authorFernandes, Ricardo J.
dc.contributor.authorVilas-Boas, J. Paulo
dc.contributor.authorSanders, Ross
dc.date.accessioned2022-03-21T16:11:44Z
dc.date.available2022-03-21T16:11:44Z
dc.date.created2021-06-09T17:11:41Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.identifier.citationSports Biomechanics. 2021, Artikkel 1921835.en_US
dc.identifier.issn1476-3141
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11250/2986628
dc.descriptionThis is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, and is not altered, transformed, or built upon in any way.en_US
dc.description.abstractThe purpose of the present study is to investigate differences between front crawl and backstroke swimming in hydrodynamic (produced by swimmers) and buoyant torque around the transverse axis. Ten swimmers performed 50 m front crawl and backstroke at four selected velocities (same velocities for both techniques). All trials were recorded by four underwater and two above-water cameras to collect data for three-dimensional whole-body motion during one stroke cycle (defined as a period between two consecutive wrist entries to the water). The inverse dynamics approach was applied to obtain buoyant and hydrodynamic torque around the transverse axis. The differences between front crawl and backstroke techniques across four levels of velocity were assessed with a two-way repeated-measures ANOVA. There was a main effect of technique on the mean buoyant and hydrodynamic torque, with 30–40 % larger leg-raising buoyant torque and leg sinking hydrodynamic torque in front crawl than in backstroke (p ≤ 0.001). The time-series data revealed that the hydrodynamic leg-sinking torque had its peaks during the first half of the underwater upper-limb motion in front crawl, but that was not observed in backstroke, implying that the strategy of counterbalancing the buoyant torque is different between the techniques.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.subjectalternating techniquesen_US
dc.subjectaquatic locomotionen_US
dc.subjectbuoyant torqueen_US
dc.subjectinverse dynamicsen_US
dc.titleDifferences in the rotational effect of buoyancy and trunk kinematics between front crawl and backstroke swimmingen_US
dc.typePeer revieweden_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.description.versionpublishedVersionen_US
dc.rights.holder© 2021 The Author(s)en_US
dc.source.pagenumber12en_US
dc.source.journalSports Biomechanicsen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1080/14763141.2021.1921835
dc.identifier.cristin1914903
dc.description.localcodeInstitutt for fysisk prestasjonsevne / Department of Physical Performanceen_US
dc.source.articlenumber1921835en_US
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.qualitycode1


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record