Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorRidgway, Charlotte L.
dc.contributor.authorBrage, Søren
dc.contributor.authorSharp, Stephen J.
dc.contributor.authorCorder, Kirsten
dc.contributor.authorWestgate, Kate
dc.contributor.authorvan Sluijs, Esther M. F.
dc.contributor.authorGoodyer, Ian M.
dc.contributor.authorHallal, Pedro C.
dc.contributor.authorAnderssen, Sigmund A.
dc.contributor.authorSardinha, Luis B.
dc.contributor.authorAndersen, Lars Bo
dc.contributor.authorEkelund, Ulf
dc.date.accessioned2012-04-11T07:53:44Z
dc.date.available2012-04-11T07:53:44Z
dc.date.issued2011-01-12
dc.identifierSeksjon for idrettsmedisinske fag / Department of Sports Medicine
dc.identifier.citationPLoS ONE. 2011, 6(1), e16125no_NO
dc.identifier.issn1932-6203
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11250/170877
dc.description© 2011 Ridgway et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.no_NO
dc.description.abstractAnimal models suggest growth restriction in utero leads to lower levels of motor activity. Furthermore, individuals with very low birth weight report lower levels of physical activity as adults. The aim of this study was to examine whether birth weight acts as a biological determinant of physical activity and sedentary time. This study uses combined analysis of three European cohorts and one from South America (n = 4,170). Birth weight was measured or parentally reported. Height and weight were measured and used to calculate Body Mass Index (BMI). PA was objectively measured using accelerometry for ≥3 days, ≥10 hours day. Data was standardized to allow comparisons between different monitors. Total physical activity was assessed as counts per minute (cpm), with time spent above moderate activity (MVPA) >2,000 counts and time spent sedentary (<100 counts). There was no evidence for an association between birth weight and total physical activity (p = 0.9) or MVPA (p = 0.7). Overall there was no evidence for an association between birth weight and sedentary time (p = 0.8). However in the Pelotas study we did find an association between higher birth weight (kg) and lower overall physical activity (cpm) (β = −31, 95%CI: −58, −46, p = 0.03) and higher birth weight and greater sedentary time (mins/day) (β = 16.4, 95%CI: 5.3, 27.5, p = 0.004), although this was attenuated and no longer significant with further adjustment for gestational age. Overall this combined analysis suggests that birth weight may not be an important biological determinant of habitual physical activity or sedentary behaviour in children and adolescents.no_NO
dc.language.isoengno_NO
dc.publisherPLoS ONEno_NO
dc.subjectadolescentno_NO
dc.subjectbirth weightno_NO
dc.subjectbody mass indexno_NO
dc.subjectEuropeno_NO
dc.subjecthumansno_NO
dc.subjectmotor activityno_NO
dc.subjectphysiologyno_NO
dc.subjectsedentary lifestyleno_NO
dc.subjectSouth Americano_NO
dc.titleDoes birth weight influence physical activity in youth? a combined analysis of four studies using objectively measured physical activityno_NO
dc.typeJournal articleno_NO
dc.typePeer reviewedno_NO
dc.subject.nsiVDP::Mathematics and natural science: 400::Basic biosciences: 470no_NO
dc.subject.nsiVDP::Agriculture and fishery disciplines: 900::Agriculture disciplines: 910no_NO
dc.source.pagenumbere16125no_NO
dc.source.volume6no_NO
dc.source.journalPLoS ONEno_NO
dc.source.issue1no_NO


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record