|dc.description.abstract||The main goal for this master thesis was to write a research article contributing to the
literature on sport event management, regarding the planning and preparation for major
sport events. This piece of work is divided into two different, but relating sections. Part
I presents the research article. Supplementary theory and methodology constitute part II.
The objective was to gain better understanding on how project organizations planning
for major sport events worked in the implementation phase, and to assess the value of
test events. The research question in the article is as follows: How were the test-events
used as a part of the effort to develop a reliable project organization?
According to existing literature concerning project management and high reliable
organizations (e.g Weick & Sutcliffe, 2007; Söderlund, Vaagaasar & Andersen, 2008;
Andersen & Hanstad, 2011), building capacity in the planning and implementation
phase are vital precursors to managing challenges and potential risks during the event.
Nevertheless, I have not been able to identify any studies of how test events may be
exploited to develop a more reliable project organization preparing a major sport event.
This is a qualitative case study. The case was the Nordic World Ski Championship 2011
and the organization SKI-VM 2011 AS (VM2011). Six leaders, from the executive
group and responsible for key functions in VM2011, were interviewed. The focus was
experiences from the test events, the organizational development, and what processes
were crucial in the implementation phase. In addition, documents were used to draw a
preliminary perception of VM2011, and to support and complement the variety of
issues discussed by the interviewees.
Findings show that project organizations preparing for major sport events cannot
mitigate potential risks, but can enhance its capacity and competence to make quick
decisions and do the right action in demanding situations. Test events have proven to
open the possibility to fine-tune an organization, if the organization prioritizes reflection
on recent actions and conceptualizing further actions. In addition, the establishment of
close relationships and mutual trust internally, and with external partners at an early
stage in the project process, was a crucial success criterion.
Part two consist of supplementary theory and methodology.||no_NO