Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorKristenson, Karolina
dc.contributor.authorBjørneboe, John Andreas
dc.contributor.authorWaldén, Markus
dc.contributor.authorAndersen, Thor Einar
dc.contributor.authorHägglund, Martin
dc.contributor.authorEkstrand, Jan
dc.date.accessioned2016-06-29T10:20:24Z
dc.date.available2016-06-29T10:20:24Z
dc.date.issued2016-03
dc.identifier.citationJournal of Science and Medicine in Sport. 2015, 19, 218-221nb_NO
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11250/2394574
dc.descriptionDette er siste tekst-versjon av artikkelen, og den kan inneholde små forskjeller fra forlagets pdf-versjon. Forlagets pdf-versjon finner du på www.elsevier.com: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jsams.2015.06.001 / This is the final text version of the article, and it may contain minor differences from the journal's pdf version. The original publication is available at www.elsevier.com: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jsams.2015.06.001nb_NO
dc.description.abstractObjectives: To investigate frequent surface shifts and match play on an unaccustomed surface as potential risk factors for injury in Scandinavian male professional football. Design: Prospective cohort study. Methods: Thirty two top-division clubs (16 Swedish, 16 Norwegian) were followed during seasons 2010 and 2011. The influence from (1) number of surface shifts (between artificial turf and grass) during five-match sequences, and (2) match play on an unaccustomed surface (other surface than on the home venue) on subsequent overuse injury risk was evaluated with generalized estimating equations (GEE). GEE results are presented with risk ratios and 95% confidence interval (CI). Injury rate was expressed as time loss injuries/1000 h, and compared between groups with a rate ratio and 95% CI. Results: No association was found between the number of surface shifts and subsequent overuse injury risk (risk ratio 1.01, 95% CI 0.91–1.12). Furthermore, no difference was seen in subsequent overuse injury risk after match play on unaccustomed compared with accustomed surface (risk ratio 1.04, 95% CI 0.78–1.38). Grass clubs (grass installed at home venue) had a lower match injury rate when playing away matches on artificial turf compared with away matches on grass (rate ratio 0.66, 95% CI 0.40–0.89). Conclusions: This study showed no association between surface shifts or playing matches on an unaccustomed surface and time-loss injury risk in professional football, suggesting that clubs and players can cope with such surface transitions.nb_NO
dc.language.isoengnb_NO
dc.publisherSports Medicine Australianb_NO
dc.subjectepidemiologynb_NO
dc.subjectlower extremitynb_NO
dc.subjectsoccernb_NO
dc.subjectsurfacenb_NO
dc.subjectsurveillancenb_NO
dc.titleNo association between surface shifts and time-loss overuse injury risk in male professional footballnb_NO
dc.typeJournal articlenb_NO
dc.typePeer reviewednb_NO
dc.subject.nsiVDP::Social science: 200nb_NO
dc.subject.nsiVDP::Social science: 200::Social science in sports: 330nb_NO
dc.subject.nsiVDP::Social science: 200::Social science in sports: 330::Other subjects within physical education: 339nb_NO
dc.source.journalJournal of Science and Medicine in Sportnb_NO
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.jsams.2015.06.001
dc.description.localcodeSeksjon for idrettsmedisinske fag / Department of Sport Medicinenb_NO


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel