Evaluation of a short protocol for indirect calorimetry in females with eating disorders and healthy controls
Journal article, Peer reviewed
MetadataVis full innførsel
- Artikler / Articles 
OriginalversjonClinical Nutrition ESPEN. 2017, 22, 28-35 10.1016/j.clnesp.2017.09.003
Background and aims: To enable clinicians to identify the clinical picture and treatment progress and to adjust eating plans according to personal energy needs, it is important to know the patient's correct resting metabolic rate (RMR). Indirect calorimetry (IC) is the preferred method for assessment of RMR, but long duration of measurement increases the load on the patients, and reduces the effectiveness in clinical and scientific settings. Further; not all patients reach a valid RMR according to the suggested best practice protocol, with 5 min of steady state (SS) where respiratory gas volume exchange varies less than 10%. The aim of this study was to evaluate the possibility for an abbreviated RMR protocol and SS criterion.Methods: Forty two women diagnosed with bulimia nervosa or binge eating disorder (eating disorder group, ED), originally recruited for an outpatient treatment study, and 26 age and gender matched healthy controls (HC) were studied during a single, prolonged IC measurement. Participants rested for 10 min in supine position wearing a two-way breathing facemask, before a continuous measurement period of 20 min. Results from a standard 5 min SS criterion was compared to an abbreviated 3 min SS criterion. Both SS-criteria were evaluated through three different SS protocols (<10% variation in respiratory gas exchange), being: 1) measurement during the first 3 or 5 min, 2) measurement after discarding the first 5 min, and 3) the lowest identified RMR during the 20 min of measurement. Results: About 50% of the participants reached an early SS in both the defined SS minute criteria. Participants reaching a valid SS throughout the 20 min of measurement increased from ∼90% to 100% with an abbreviated 3 min SS. With a 5 min SS criterion, the median (range) RMR for the 3 protocols were 1639.9 (1239.2), 1508.8 (1457.6) and 1500.6 (1328.8) respectively for the ED group, and 1702.2 (1239.4), 1608.4 (1076.4) and 1594.8 (1029.2) respectively for the HC group, (p > 0.05 for all between-group analysis). With a 3 min SS criterion, the median (range) RMR were 1533.6 (1298.2), 1461.2 (1406.1), and 1395.8 (1447.3) respectively for the ED group and 1681.7 (1332.4), 1613.7 (1266.0) and 1523.1 (1050.3), respectively for the HC group, (p > 0.05 for all between-group analysis). Lowest measured RMR was different compared to the other two SS protocols in both the ED- and the HC group, and for both the 5 min- and the 3 min SS criteria, respectively (p < 0.04). Furthermore, a SS of 3 min resulted in lower RMR compared to 5 min SS (p < 0.00) and an increased number of participants classified as hypo-metabolic (RMRmeasured/RMRcalculated < 0.9). Conclusions: An abbreviated measurement protocol to identify the lowest RMR using IC was not successful. Abbreviating the SS criteria from 5 to 3 min, resulted in a lower RMR, hence encouraging further examination of the validity of shorter SS criterion than practiced today.