Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorKoga, Hideyuki
dc.contributor.authorNakamae, Atsuo
dc.contributor.authorShima, Yosuke
dc.contributor.authorBahr, Roald
dc.contributor.authorKrosshaug, Tron
dc.date.accessioned2017-11-20T10:17:48Z
dc.date.available2017-11-20T10:17:48Z
dc.date.issued2017
dc.identifier.citationThe American Journal of Sports Medicine. 2017, doi: 10.1177/0363546516665810nb_NO
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11250/2467114
dc.descriptionI Brage finner du siste tekst-versjon av artikkelen, og den kan inneholde ubetydelige forskjeller fra forlagets pdf-versjon. Forlagets pdf-versjon finner du på journals.sagepub.com / In Brage you'll find the final text version of the article, and it may contain insignificant differences from the journal's pdf version. The definitive version is available at journals.sagepub.comnb_NO
dc.description.abstractBackground: Detailed kinematic descriptions of real anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury situations are limited to the knee only. Purpose: To describe hip and ankle kinematics as well as foot position relative to the center of mass (COM) in ACL injury situations through use of a model-based image-matching (MBIM) technique. The distance between the projection of the COM on the ground and the base of support (BOS) (COM_BOS) normalized to the femur length was also evaluated. Study Design: Descriptive laboratory study. Methods: Ten ACL injury video sequences from women’s handball and basketball were analyzed. Hip and ankle joint kinematic values were obtained by use of MBIM. Results: The mean hip flexion angle was 51° (95% CI, 41° to 63°) at initial contact and remained constant over the next 40 milliseconds. The hip was internally rotated 29° (95% CI, 18° to 39°) at initial contact and remained unchanged for the next 40 milliseconds. All of the injured patients landed with a heel strike with a mean dorsiflexion angle of 2° (95% CI, –9° to 14°), before reaching a flatfooted position 20 milliseconds later. The foot position was anterior and lateral to the COM in all cases. However, none of the results showed larger COM_BOS than 1.2, which has been suggested as a criterion for ACL injury risk. Conclusions: Hip kinematic values were consistent among the 10 ACL injury situations analyzed; the hip joint remained unchanged in a flexed and internally rotated position in the phase leading up to injury, suggesting that limited energy absorption took place at the hip. In all cases, the foot contacted the ground with the heel strike. However, relatively small COM_BOS distances were found, indicating that the anterior and lateral foot placement in ACL injury situations was not different from what can be expected in noninjury game situations.nb_NO
dc.language.isoengnb_NO
dc.publisherSagenb_NO
dc.subjectanterior cruciate ligament (ACL)nb_NO
dc.subjectinjury mechanismnb_NO
dc.subjectvideo analysisnb_NO
dc.subjecthip kinematicsnb_NO
dc.subjectankle kinematicsnb_NO
dc.titleHip and Ankle Kinematics in Noncontact Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injury Situations: Video Analysis Using Model-Based Image Matchingnb_NO
dc.typeJournal articlenb_NO
dc.typePeer reviewednb_NO
dc.source.journalThe American Journal of Sports Medicinenb_NO
dc.identifier.doi10.1177/0363546516665810
dc.description.localcodeSeksjon for idrettsmedisinske fag / Department of Sports Medicinenb_NO


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel