Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorStrittmatter, Anna-Maria
dc.contributor.authorStenling, Cecilia
dc.contributor.authorFahlen, Josef
dc.contributor.authorSkille, Eivind Å.
dc.date.accessioned2018-11-01T12:54:22Z
dc.date.available2018-11-01T12:54:22Z
dc.date.created2018-10-26T10:57:43Z
dc.date.issued2018
dc.identifier.citationInternational Journal of Sport Policy and Politics. 2018, 10, 621-635.nb_NO
dc.identifier.issn1940-6940
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11250/2570632
dc.descriptionThis is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided theoriginal work is properly cited, and is not altered, transformed, or built upon in any way.nb_NO
dc.description.abstractBy providing an analytical framework that draws on a conceptualisation of legitimacy in organisation studies, this paper demonstrates that the sport policy process can be understood as an interlinked chain of legitimating acts. Based on recent suggestions in organisation theory literature on how to approach legitimacy and legitimation, we applied the framework on a small sample of published sport policy studies to demonstrate its utility. By applying the framework, six interweaved and interweaving elements of the legitimating act within sport policy processes were identified: legitimacy-seeking organisation, subject, source(s), strategy, bases and scenario. The analysis shows that each of the six elements works by intersecting within each phase of the policy process. The main conclusion is that consequences – often unintended – resulting from legitimating acts in one phase have legitimacy-related implications for the other phases of the policy process. As pressing as pinpointing the use of all elements of the framework is, it is equally important to distinguish each of the elements in order to fulfil the analytical potential of the proposed framework. Since sport policy processes in practice rely primarily on organisations and organisational action, future sport policy research would benefit from this type of framework connecting organisations and organising to policy processes.nb_NO
dc.language.isoengnb_NO
dc.subjectlegitimacynb_NO
dc.subjectorganisation theorynb_NO
dc.subjectpublic policynb_NO
dc.subjectunintended consequencesnb_NO
dc.titleSport policy analysis revisited: the sport policy process as an interlinked chain of legitimating actsnb_NO
dc.title.alternativeSport policy analysis revisited: the sport policy process as an interlinked chain of legitimating actsnb_NO
dc.typeJournal articlenb_NO
dc.typePeer reviewednb_NO
dc.description.versionpublishedVersionnb_NO
dc.rights.holder© 2018 The Author(s).nb_NO
dc.source.pagenumber15nb_NO
dc.source.journalInternational Journal of Sport Policy and Politicsnb_NO
dc.identifier.doi10.1080/19406940.2018.1522657
dc.identifier.cristin1623810
dc.description.localcodeSeksjon for kultur og samfunn / Department of Cultural and Social Studiesnb_NO
cristin.unitcode150,33,0,0
cristin.unitnameSeksjon for kultur og samfunn
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.qualitycode1


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel