Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorJahre, Anette B.
dc.contributor.authorBere, Elling Tufte
dc.contributor.authorNordengen, Solveig
dc.contributor.authorSolbraa, Ane Kristiansen
dc.contributor.authorAndersen, Lars Bo
dc.contributor.authorRiiser, Amund
dc.contributor.authorBjørnarå, Helga Birgit
dc.date.accessioned2020-03-18T17:27:00Z
dc.date.available2020-03-18T17:27:00Z
dc.date.created2019-06-05T13:44:04Z
dc.date.issued2019
dc.identifier.citationPreventive Medicine Reports. 2019, 14, 100881.en_US
dc.identifier.issn2211-3355
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11250/2647446
dc.descriptionThis is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/BY/4.0/).en_US
dc.description.abstractLarge-scale analyses on the travel behavior of e-bikes are scarce, and current knowledge regarding who the e- bike owners are is inconsistent. Also, commuters represent a relevant user group with an unexploited potential. Therefore, the purpose of the present study was to examine (i) associations between type of bike (e-bike vs. regular bike) with place of residence (county), sociodemographic variables (age, sex, educational level, income and ethnicity) and habitual physical activity level, and (ii) if public employees possessing an e-bike cycle more often and longer distances to work. A cross-sectional survey was conducted in 2017 among 1977 (5.2% of eligible subjects) public employees in Southern and Western Norway. Binary and multinomial logistic regression analyses were conducted. Respondents possessing an e-bike were less likely to perform high levels of leisure time physical activity (OR 0.56 (CI 0.39-0.82)), compared to those possessing a regular bike only. For those residing in Agder, the likelihood of possessing an e-bike (vs. regular bike) was almost 4 times higher (OR 3.98 (CI 2.53- 6.26)), compared with participants residing in Sogn og Fjordane. Compared with those possessing a regular bike only, e-bike users cycled more frequently to work, both occasionally (OR 3.71 (CI 2.44-5.65)) and most of the time (OR 4.28 (CI 2.79-6.55)), and they had higher odds of cycling medium distances to the workplace (OR 1.74 (CI 1.04-2.90)). In conclusion, e-bike access could result in increased commuter cycling, both in terms of cycling frequency and cycling distance, which in turn could contribute to enhanced physical activity levels.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.subjecte-bikeen_US
dc.subjectbicycleen_US
dc.subjectactive travelen_US
dc.subjectactive commutingen_US
dc.subjectpublic employeesen_US
dc.subjectSouthern Norwayen_US
dc.subjectWestern Norwayen_US
dc.titlePublic employees in South-Western Norway using an e-bike or a regular bike for commuting: A cross-sectional comparison on sociodemographic factors, commuting frequency and commuting distanceen_US
dc.typePeer revieweden_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.description.versionpublishedVersionen_US
dc.rights.holder© 2019 The Author(s)en_US
dc.source.pagenumber6en_US
dc.source.volume14en_US
dc.source.journalPreventive Medicine Reportsen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.pmedr.2019.100881
dc.identifier.cristin1702969
dc.description.localcodeSeksjon for idrettsmedisinske fag / Department of Sports Medicineen_US
cristin.unitcode150,34,0,0
cristin.unitnameSeksjon for idrettsmedisinske fag
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.qualitycode1


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel