Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorPsilander, Niklas
dc.contributor.authorEftestøl, Einar
dc.contributor.authorCumming, Kristoffer Toldnes
dc.contributor.authorSolgård, Inga Juvkam
dc.contributor.authorEkblom, Maria M.
dc.contributor.authorSunding, Kerstin
dc.contributor.authorWernbom, Mathias
dc.contributor.authorHolmberg, Hans-Christer
dc.contributor.authorEkblom, Björn
dc.contributor.authorBruusgaard, Jo C.
dc.contributor.authorRaastad, Truls
dc.contributor.authorGundersen, Kristian
dc.date.accessioned2020-06-24T09:05:40Z
dc.date.available2020-06-24T09:05:40Z
dc.date.created2019-09-25T13:17:05Z
dc.date.issued2019
dc.identifier.citationJournal of applied physiology. 2019, 126(6), 1636-1645.en_US
dc.identifier.issn8750-7587
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11250/2659258
dc.descriptionI Brage finner du siste tekst-versjon av artikkelen, og den kan inneholde ubetydelige forskjeller fra forlagets pdf-versjon. Forlagets pdf-versjon finner du på onlinelibrary.wiley.com / In Brage you'll find the final text version of the article, and it may contain insignificant differences from the journal's pdf version. The definitive version is available at onlinelibrary.wiley.com.en_US
dc.description.abstractPreviously trained mouse muscles acquire strength and volume faster than naïve muscles; it has been suggested that this is related to increased myonuclear density. The present study aimed to determine whether a previously strength-trained leg (mem-leg) would respond better to a period of strength training than a previously untrained leg (con-leg). Nine men and 10 women performed unilateral strength training (T1) for 10 wk, followed by 20 wk of detraining (DT) and a 5-wk bilateral retraining period (T2). Muscle biopsies were taken before and after each training period and analyzed for myonuclear number, fiber volume, and cross-sectional area (CSA). Ultrasound and one repetition of maximum leg extension were performed to determine muscle thickness (MT) and strength. CSA (~17%), MT (~10%), and strength (~20%) increased during T1 in the mem-leg. However, the myonuclear number and fiber volume did not change. MT and CSA returned to baseline values during DT, but strength remained elevated (~60%), supporting previous findings of a long-lasting motor learning effect. MT and strength increased similarly in the mem-leg and con-leg during T2, whereas CSA, fiber volume, and myonuclear number remained unaffected. In conclusion, training response during T2 did not differ between the mem-leg and con-leg. However, this does not discount the existence of human muscle memory, since no increase in the number of myonuclei was detected during T1 and no clear detraining effect was observed for cell size during DT; thus, the present data did not allow for a rigorous test of the muscle memory hypothesis.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.subjectCSAen_US
dc.subjectexerciseen_US
dc.subjectmotor learningen_US
dc.subjectmuscle memoryen_US
dc.subjectmyonucleien_US
dc.titleEffects of training, detraining, and retraining on strength, hypertrophy, and myonuclear number in human skeletal muscleen_US
dc.typePeer revieweden_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.description.versionacceptedVersionen_US
dc.source.pagenumber1636-1645en_US
dc.source.volume126en_US
dc.source.journalJournal of applied physiologyen_US
dc.source.issue6en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1152/japplphysiol.00917.2018
dc.identifier.cristin1728886
dc.relation.projectNorges forskningsråd: 240374en_US
dc.description.localcodeSeksjon for fysisk prestasjonsevne / Department of Physical Performanceen_US
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.fulltextpostprint
cristin.qualitycode1


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel