dc.contributor.author | Johansen, Bjørn Tore | |
dc.contributor.author | Ommundsen, Yngvar | |
dc.contributor.author | Haugen, Tommy | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2020-09-07T10:31:46Z | |
dc.date.available | 2020-09-07T10:31:46Z | |
dc.date.created | 2018-07-06T08:04:13Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2018 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Psychology of Sport And Exercise. 2018, 38, 184-191. | nb_NO |
dc.identifier.issn | 1469-0292 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/11250/2676628 | |
dc.description | I Brage finner du siste tekst-versjon av artikkelen, og den kan inneholde ubetydelige forskjeller fra forlagets pdf-versjon. Forlagets pdf-versjon finner du på sciencedirect.com / In Brage you'll find the final text version of the article, and it may contain insignificant differences from the journal's pdf version. The definitive version is available at sciencedirect.com | nb_NO |
dc.description.abstract | Objectives: The purpose of this study was two-fold. Firstly, to examine the measurement/factorial validity and invariance of the Referee Self-Efficacy Scale (REFS) among Norwegian soccer referees. Secondly, extending scale validation, we also tested a structural model in which a second-order version of the REFS was modelled to mediate a set of theoretically informed antecedents and outcomes. Design: Cross-sectional. Method: One hundred and eleven Norwegian elite referees and 81 non-elite referees completed an electronic questionnaire measuring expected antecedents and outcomes of perceived self-efficacy in the role as referees. Results: Analyses provided support for the first – and second order versions of the REFS scale as well as for scale invariance. Further, a task goal and experience as referee related positively to referee positive affect, mediated by referee efficacy. Unexpectedly, physical preparation related directly to positive affect, whereas no mediation effects or direct effects for mental preparation and ego goal were observed. Conclusions: Measurement/factorial validity and invariance of the REFS were fully supported. Validity of the scale in mediation model by Guillén and Feltz (2011) was only partly supported. | nb_NO |
dc.language.iso | eng | nb_NO |
dc.subject | referee self-efficacy scale | nb_NO |
dc.subject | elite referee | nb_NO |
dc.subject | non-elite referee | nb_NO |
dc.subject | validation | nb_NO |
dc.title | Referee efficacy in the context of Norwegian soccer referees – A meaningful construct? | nb_NO |
dc.title.alternative | Referee efficacy in the context of Norwegian soccer referees – A meaningful construct? | nb_NO |
dc.type | Journal article | nb_NO |
dc.type | Peer reviewed | nb_NO |
dc.description.version | acceptedVersion | nb_NO |
dc.source.pagenumber | 184-191 | nb_NO |
dc.source.volume | 38 | nb_NO |
dc.source.journal | Psychology of Sport And Exercise | nb_NO |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1016/j.psychsport.2018.06.013 | |
dc.identifier.cristin | 1596046 | |
dc.description.localcode | Seksjon for coaching og psykologi / Department of Coaching and Psychology | nb_NO |
cristin.unitcode | 150,32,0,0 | |
cristin.unitname | Seksjon for coaching og psykologi | |
cristin.ispublished | true | |
cristin.fulltext | postprint | |
cristin.qualitycode | 1 | |