Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorJohansen, Bjørn Tore
dc.contributor.authorOmmundsen, Yngvar
dc.contributor.authorHaugen, Tommy
dc.date.accessioned2020-09-07T10:31:46Z
dc.date.available2020-09-07T10:31:46Z
dc.date.created2018-07-06T08:04:13Z
dc.date.issued2018
dc.identifier.citationPsychology of Sport And Exercise. 2018, 38, 184-191.nb_NO
dc.identifier.issn1469-0292
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11250/2676628
dc.descriptionI Brage finner du siste tekst-versjon av artikkelen, og den kan inneholde ubetydelige forskjeller fra forlagets pdf-versjon. Forlagets pdf-versjon finner du på sciencedirect.com / In Brage you'll find the final text version of the article, and it may contain insignificant differences from the journal's pdf version. The definitive version is available at sciencedirect.comnb_NO
dc.description.abstractObjectives: The purpose of this study was two-fold. Firstly, to examine the measurement/factorial validity and invariance of the Referee Self-Efficacy Scale (REFS) among Norwegian soccer referees. Secondly, extending scale validation, we also tested a structural model in which a second-order version of the REFS was modelled to mediate a set of theoretically informed antecedents and outcomes. Design: Cross-sectional. Method: One hundred and eleven Norwegian elite referees and 81 non-elite referees completed an electronic questionnaire measuring expected antecedents and outcomes of perceived self-efficacy in the role as referees. Results: Analyses provided support for the first – and second order versions of the REFS scale as well as for scale invariance. Further, a task goal and experience as referee related positively to referee positive affect, mediated by referee efficacy. Unexpectedly, physical preparation related directly to positive affect, whereas no mediation effects or direct effects for mental preparation and ego goal were observed. Conclusions: Measurement/factorial validity and invariance of the REFS were fully supported. Validity of the scale in mediation model by Guillén and Feltz (2011) was only partly supported.nb_NO
dc.language.isoengnb_NO
dc.subjectreferee self-efficacy scalenb_NO
dc.subjectelite refereenb_NO
dc.subjectnon-elite refereenb_NO
dc.subjectvalidationnb_NO
dc.titleReferee efficacy in the context of Norwegian soccer referees – A meaningful construct?nb_NO
dc.title.alternativeReferee efficacy in the context of Norwegian soccer referees – A meaningful construct?nb_NO
dc.typeJournal articlenb_NO
dc.typePeer reviewednb_NO
dc.description.versionacceptedVersionnb_NO
dc.source.pagenumber184-191nb_NO
dc.source.volume38nb_NO
dc.source.journalPsychology of Sport And Exercisenb_NO
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.psychsport.2018.06.013
dc.identifier.cristin1596046
dc.description.localcodeSeksjon for coaching og psykologi / Department of Coaching and Psychologynb_NO
cristin.unitcode150,32,0,0
cristin.unitnameSeksjon for coaching og psykologi
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextpostprint
cristin.qualitycode1


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel