Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorHoogeboom, Thomas J
dc.contributor.authorKousemaker, Martijn C
dc.contributor.authorVan Meeteren, Nico
dc.contributor.authorHowe, Tracey
dc.contributor.authorBø, Kari
dc.contributor.authorTugwell, Peter
dc.contributor.authorFerreira, Manuela L.
dc.contributor.authorDe Bie, Rob A
dc.contributor.authorvan den Ende, Cornelia
dc.contributor.authorStevens-Lapsley, Jennifer E
dc.date.accessioned2021-02-01T11:28:25Z
dc.date.available2021-02-01T11:28:25Z
dc.date.created2020-11-23T19:33:21Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.identifier.citationBritish Journal of Sports Medicine. 2020, under utgivelse.en_US
dc.identifier.issn0306-3674
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11250/2725545
dc.descriptionThis is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.en_US
dc.description.abstractObjective: When appraising the quality of randomised clinical trial (RCTs) on the merits of exercise therapy, we typically limit our assessment to the quality of the methods. However, heterogeneity across studies can also be caused by differences in the quality of the exercise interventions (ie, ‘the potential effectiveness of a specific intervention given the potential target group of patients’)—a challenging concept to assess. We propose an internationally developed, consensus-based tool that aims to assess the quality of exercise therapy programmes studied in RCTs: the international Consensus on Therapeutic Exercise aNd Training (i-CONTENT) tool. Methods: Forty-nine experts (from 12 different countries) in the field of physical and exercise therapy participated in a four-stage Delphi approach to develop the i-CONTENT tool: (1) item generation (Delphi round 1), (2) item selection (Delphi rounds 2 and 3), (3) item specification (focus group discussion) and (4) tool development and refinement (working group discussion and piloting). Results: Out of the 61 items generated in the first Delphi round, consensus was reached on 17 items, resulting in seven final items that form the i-CONTENT tool: (1) patient selection; (2) qualified supervisor; (3) type and timing of outcome assessment; (4) dosage parameters (frequency, intensity, time); (5) type of exercise; (6) safety of the exercise programme and (7) adherence to the exercise programme. Conclusion: The i-CONTENT-tool is a step towards transparent assessment of the quality of exercise therapy programmes studied in RCTs, and ultimately, towards the development of future, higher quality, exercise interventions.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.subjectconsensusen_US
dc.subjectexercise rehabilitationen_US
dc.subjectphysiotherapyen_US
dc.subjectvalidityen_US
dc.titleI-CONTENT tool for assessing therapeutic quality of exercise programs employed in randomised clinical trialsen_US
dc.typePeer revieweden_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.description.versionpublishedVersionen_US
dc.rights.holder© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020.en_US
dc.source.pagenumber9en_US
dc.source.journalBritish Journal of Sports Medicineen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1136/bjsports-2019-101630
dc.identifier.cristin1851281
dc.description.localcodeInstitutt for idrettsmedisinske fag / Department of Sports Medicineen_US
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.qualitycode2


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel