Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorLuteberget, Live
dc.contributor.authorRaastad, Truls
dc.contributor.authorSeynnes, Olivier R.
dc.contributor.authorSpencer, Matt
dc.date.accessioned2015-03-24T12:42:40Z
dc.date.available2015-03-24T12:42:40Z
dc.date.issued2014
dc.identifier.citationInternational Journal of Sports Physiology and Performance. 2014, under utgivelse. doi:10.1123/ijspp.2014-0276nb_NO
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11250/280184
dc.descriptionI Brage finner du siste tekst-versjon av artikkelen, og den kan inneholde ubetydelige forskjeller fra forlagets pdf-versjon. Forlagets pdf-versjon finner du på www.humankinetics.com: http://dx.doi.org/10.1123/ijspp.2014-0276 / In Brage you'll find the final text version of the article, and it may contain insignificant differences from the journal's pdf version. The original publication is available at www.humankinetics.com: http://dx.doi.org/10.1123/ijspp.2014-0276nb_NO
dc.description.abstractFast acceleration is an important performance factor in handball. In addition to traditional sprint training (TST), resisted sprint training (RST) is a method often used to improve acceleration. However, studies on RST show conflicting results, and underlying mechanisms are not studied. Purpose: To compare the effects of RST, by sled towing, against traditional sprint training on sprint performance and muscle architecture. Methods: Participants (n=18) were assigned to either RST or TST and completed two training sessions of RST or TST per week (10 weeks), in addition to their normal team training. Sprint-tests (10-m and 30-m) and measurements of muscle architecture were performed pre- and post-training. Results: Beneficial effects were found in the 30-m sprint test (mean; ±90% CL) for both groups (TST=-0.31; ±0.19 s, RST=-0.16; ±0.13 s), with unclear differences between the groups. Only TST had a beneficial effect on 10-m time (-0.04; ±0.04 s), with a likely difference between the two groups (85 %, ES= 0.60). Both groups had a decrease in pennation angle (-6.0; ±3.3% for TST and -2.8; ±2.0% for RST), which had a nearly perfect correlation with percentage change in 10-m sprint performance (r=0.92). A small increase in fascicle length (5.3; ±3.9% and 4.0; ±2.1% for TST and RST, respectively) was found, with unclear differences between groups. Discussion: TST appears to be more effective than RST in enhancing 10-m sprint time. Both groups showed similar effects in 30-m sprint time. A similar, yet small, effect of sprint training on muscle architecture was observed in both groups.nb_NO
dc.language.isoengnb_NO
dc.publisherHuman Kineticsnb_NO
dc.subjectmuscle architecturenb_NO
dc.subjectaccelerationnb_NO
dc.subjectteam sportsnb_NO
dc.subjectpennation anglenb_NO
dc.titleEffect of traditional and resisted sprint training in highly-trained, female team handball playersnb_NO
dc.typeJournal articlenb_NO
dc.typePeer reviewednb_NO
dc.subject.nsiVDP::Social science: 200::Social science in sports: 330::Other subjects within physical education: 339nb_NO
dc.source.journalInternational Journal of Sports Physiology and Performancenb_NO
dc.description.localcodeSeksjon for fysisk prestasjonsevne / Department of Physical Performancenb_NO


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel