Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorGrindem, Hege
dc.contributor.authorGranan, Lars-Petter
dc.contributor.authorRisberg, May Arna
dc.contributor.authorEngebretsen, Lars
dc.contributor.authorSnyder-Mackler, Lynn
dc.contributor.authorEitzen, Ingrid
dc.date.accessioned2015-04-20T11:03:05Z
dc.date.available2015-04-20T11:03:05Z
dc.date.issued2014-10-28
dc.identifier.citationBritish Journal of Sports Medicine. 2014, 49, 358-389nb_NO
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11250/282076
dc.descriptionI Brage finner du siste tekst-versjon av artikkelen, og den kan inneholde ubetydelige forskjeller fra forlagets pdf-versjon. Forlagets pdf-versjon finner du på bjsm.bmj.com: http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bjsports-2014-093891 / In Brage you'll find the final text version of the article, and it may contain insignificant differences from the journal's pdf version. The original publication is available at bjsm.bmj.com: http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bjsports-2014-093891nb_NO
dc.description.abstractBackground: Preoperative knee function is associated with successful postoperative outcome after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR). However, there are few longer term studies of patients who underwent progressive preoperative and postoperative rehabilitation compared to usual care. Objectives: To compare preoperative and 2 year postoperative patient-reported outcomes (PROs) in patients undergoing progressive preoperative and postoperative rehabilitation at a sports medicine clinic compared with usual care. Methods: We included patients aged 16–40 years undergoing primary unilateral ACLR. The preoperative and 2 year postoperative Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) of 84 patients undergoing progressive preoperative and postoperative rehabilitation at a sports medicine clinic (Norwegian Research Center for Active Rehabilitation (NAR) cohort) were compared with the scores of 2690 patients from the Norwegian National Knee Ligament Registry (NKLR). The analyses were adjusted for sex, age, months from injury to surgery and cartilage/meniscus injury at ACLR. Results: The NAR cohort had significantly better preoperative KOOS in all subscales, with clinically relevant differences (>10 points) observed in KOOS Pain, activities of daily living (ADL), Sports and Quality of Life. At 2 years, the NAR cohort still had significantly better KOOS with clinically relevant differences in KOOS Symptoms, Sports and Quality of Life. At 2 years, 85.7–94% of the patients in the NAR cohort scored within the normative range of the different KOOS subscales, compared to 51.4–75.8% of the patients in the NKLR. Conclusions: Patients in a prospective cohort who underwent progressive preoperative and postoperative rehabilitation at a sports medicine clinic showed superior patient-reported outcomes both preoperatively and 2 years postoperatively compared to patients in the NKLR who received usual care.nb_NO
dc.language.isoengnb_NO
dc.publisherBMJ Publishingnb_NO
dc.titleHow does a combined preoperative and postoperative rehabilitation programme influence the outcome of ACL reconstruction 2 years after surgery?: a comparison between patients in the Delaware-Oslo ACL Cohort and the Norwegian National Knee Ligament Registrynb_NO
dc.typeJournal articlenb_NO
dc.typePeer reviewednb_NO
dc.subject.nsiVDP::Social science: 200::Social science in sports: 330::Other subjects within physical education: 339nb_NO
dc.source.journalBritish Journal of Sports Medicinenb_NO
dc.description.localcodeSeksjon for idretssmedisinske fag / Department of Sports Medicinenb_NO


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record