Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorMoksnes, Håvard
dc.contributor.authorArdern, Clare L.
dc.contributor.authorKvist, Joanna
dc.contributor.authorEngebretsen, Lars
dc.contributor.authorRisberg, May Arna
dc.contributor.authorMyklebust, Grethe
dc.contributor.authorGrindem, Hege
dc.date.accessioned2021-12-08T12:02:01Z
dc.date.available2021-12-08T12:02:01Z
dc.date.created2021-09-22T13:17:57Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.identifier.citationPhysical Therapy in Sport. 2021, 52(November 2021), 147-154.en_US
dc.identifier.issn1466-853X
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11250/2833346
dc.descriptionThis is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).en_US
dc.description.abstractObjectives: To assess the implementation, limited efficacy, and acceptability of the BEAST (better and safer return to sport) tool – a rehabilitation and return-to-sport (RTS) decision tool after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) in nonprofessional athletes. Design: Prospective cohort. Participants: 43 nonprofessional pivoting sport athletes with ACLR. Main outcome: Clinician- and athlete-experienced implementation challenges (implementation), changes in quadriceps power, side hop and triple hop performance from 6 to 8 months after ACLR (limited efficacy), athletes’ beliefs about the individual rehabilitation and RTS plans produced by the BEAST tool (acceptability). Results: The BEAST tool was developed and then implemented as planned for 39/43 (91%) athletes. Hop and quadriceps power performance improved significantly, with the largest improvement in involved quadriceps power (standardised response mean 1.4, 95% CI:1.1–1.8). Athletes believed the rehabilitation and RTS plan would facilitate RTS (8.2 [SD: 2.0]) and reduce injury risk (8.3 [SD: 1.2]; 0 = not likely at all, 10 = extremely likely). Conclusion: The BEAST tool was implemented with few challenges and adjustments were rarely necessary. Athletes had large improvements in quadriceps power and hop performance on the involved leg. Athletes believed that the individual rehabilitation and RTS plans produced by the tool would facilitate RTS and reduce injury risk. Highlights • The BEAST tool is for nonprofessional athletes with ACL reconstruction. • The tool produces individual rehabilitation and return-to-sport plans. • It was implemented with few challenges and adjustments were rarely necessary. • Athletes had large improvements in involved side quadriceps power and hop performance. • Athletes believed the plans would facilitate return-to-sport and reduce injury risk.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.subjectanterior cruciate ligamenten_US
dc.subjectanterior cruciate ligament reconstructionen_US
dc.subjectexercise therapyen_US
dc.subjectrehabilitationen_US
dc.subjectreturn to sporten_US
dc.titleAssessing implementation, limited efficacy, and acceptability of the BEAST tool: A rehabilitation and return-to-sport decision tool for nonprofessional athletes with anterior cruciate ligament reconstructionen_US
dc.typePeer revieweden_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.description.versionpublishedVersionen_US
dc.rights.holder© 2021 The Authorsen_US
dc.source.pagenumber147-154en_US
dc.source.volume52en_US
dc.source.journalPhysical Therapy in Sporten_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.ptsp.2021.08.011
dc.identifier.cristin1937136
dc.description.localcodeInstitutt for idrettsmedisinske fag / Department of Sports Medicineen_US
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.qualitycode1


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail
Thumbnail
Thumbnail
Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel