Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorSkille, Eivind Åsrum
dc.contributor.authorLehtonen, Kati
dc.contributor.authorFahlén, Josef
dc.date.accessioned2022-03-22T01:09:53Z
dc.date.available2022-03-22T01:09:53Z
dc.date.created2022-02-14T20:51:37Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.identifier.citationEuropean Sport Management Quarterly. 2021, Artikkel 18922161.en_US
dc.identifier.issn1618-4742
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11250/2986663
dc.descriptionThis is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, and is not altered, transformed, or built upon in any way.en_US
dc.description.abstractResearch Question: The authors studied the complexity surrounding the organization of sport in nations without nation-state status, exploring three research questions: (1) How do representatives of Sámi sport organizations in Finland and Norway perceive and act upon the proposal to reorganize Sámi sport? (2) How do representatives of the Sámi parliaments in Finland and Norway perceive and act upon the proposal to reorganize Sámi sport? (3) How do representatives of the state bureaucracy in Finland perceive and act upon the proposal to reorganize Sámi sport? Research Methods: We interviewed representatives of the Sámi parliaments and Sámi sport in Norway and Finland, an external consultant in Norway and a state official of Finland constituting a total of eight key actor interviews. Results and Findings: The analysis revealed the dominant role of the Norwegian side of Sámi sport, largely based on the institutional power of the Sámi parliament in Norway. In that respect, voluntary sport organizations in both Finland and Norway were reluctant to consider or were even negative towards an ongoing reorganization of Sámi sport since it was initiated by the Norwegian authorities and by the Norwegian Sámi parliament. Implications: Decision-makers in government agencies involved in cross-border and cross-sectoral issues should consider the opinions of all parties involved. Moreover, concerning indigenous groups striving for self-determination in post-colonial contexts, it is important to create a unified voice in matters important to the group as a collective.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.subjectindigenous sporten_US
dc.subjectsport organizationen_US
dc.subjectsport policyen_US
dc.titleThe politics of organizing indigenous sport: Cross-border and cross-sectoral complexityen_US
dc.typePeer revieweden_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.description.versionpublishedVersionen_US
dc.rights.holder© 2021 The Author(s)en_US
dc.source.pagenumber18en_US
dc.source.journalEuropean Sport Management Quarterlyen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1080/16184742.2021.1892161
dc.identifier.cristin2001571
dc.description.localcodeInstitutt for idrett og samfunnsvitenskap / Department of Sport and Social Sciencesen_US
dc.source.articlenumber18922161en_US
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.qualitycode2


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel