Task-specific differences in lower limb biomechanics during dynamic movements in individuals with chronic ankle instability compared with controls
Peer reviewed, Journal article
Published version
View/ Open
Date
2024Metadata
Show full item recordCollections
- Artikler / Articles [2235]
- Publikasjoner fra Cristin [1224]
Original version
Gait & Posture. 2024, 113(September 2024), Side 265-271. 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2024.07.004Abstract
Background: Chronic ankle instability (CAI) has been associated with lower limb deficits that can lead to altered biomechanics during dynamic tasks. There have been contradictory findings in terms of ankle and hip joint biomechanics to date, influenced by the variety of movement tasks and varying definitions of the CAI condition.
Research Question: How do biomechanical variables of the lower extremity differ during walking, running, and jump-landing in individuals with CAI compared with those without CAI?
Methods: Thirty-two individuals (17 CAI and 15 controls) participated in this retrospective case-control study. Sagittal and frontal plane ankle and hip joint angles and moments, and mediolateral foot balance (MLFB) were calculated during the tasks. Statistical parametric mapping (SPM) was used for the whole trajectory analysis to detect group differences. Discrete variables, including initial contact (IC) and peak angles and moments, were additionally compared.
Results: No differences were found between groups during walking. During running, the CAI group exhibited a lower plantar flexor moment (p < 0.001) and more laterally deviated MLFB (p = 0.014) during mid-stance when compared to controls. Additionally, participants with CAI had a significantly greater peak plantar flexion angle in early stance (p = 0.022) and a reduced peak plantar flexor moment (p = 0.002). In the jump-landing, the CAI group demonstrated an increased hip extensor moment (p = 0.008), and a greater peak hip adduction angle (p = 0.039) shortly after ground contact compared to the control group.
Significance: Differences in ankle and hip biomechanics were observed between groups during running and jump landing, but not during walking. These differences may be indicative of impairments in the sensorimotor system or of learnt strategies adopted to try to minimise instability and injury risk and can help to inform future intervention design.