Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorMajida, Memona
dc.contributor.authorBrækken, Ingeborg Hoff
dc.contributor.authorBø, Kari
dc.contributor.authorBenth, Jurate S.
dc.contributor.authorEngh, Marie Ellstrøm
dc.date.accessioned2011-02-01T14:07:10Z
dc.date.available2011-02-01T14:07:10Z
dc.date.issued2010-02-22
dc.identifierSeksjon for idrettsmedisinske fag / Department of Sports Medicine
dc.identifier.citationUltrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology. 2010, 35(6), 715-722en_US
dc.identifier.issn0960-7692
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11250/170673
dc.descriptionI Brage finner du siste tekst-versjon av artikkelen, og den kan inneholde ubetydelige forskjeller fra forlagets pdf-versjon. Forlagets pdf-versjon finner du på onlinelibrary.wiley.com: http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/uog.7587 / In Brage you'll find the final text version of the article, and it may contain insignificant differences from the journal's pdf version. The original publication is available at onlinelibrary.wiley.com: http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/uog.7587en_US
dc.description.abstractObjective: To compare biometric measurements of the pubovisceral muscle during rest, measured using transperineal three-dimensional (3D) ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Methods: In this prospective study, 18 female volunteers underwent 3D perineal ultrasound examination and MRI. All women were examined at rest in the supine position and the following measurements were taken: area and anteroposterior and transverse diameters of the levator hiatus; thickness of the pubovisceral muscle, measured lateral to the vagina and to the rectum, on the right and left sides; length of the levator–urethra gap (LUG), measured from the center of the urethra to the insertion of the pubovisceral muscle on the pubic bone. Interclass correlation coefficients (ICC) between the measurements obtained with 3D ultrasound and with MRI were calculated. To quantify the intermeasurement agreement, the bias and SDs were calculated, and limits of agreement constructed. One investigator performed all the analyses. Results: There was no significant difference between the mean values of the measurements by 3D perineal ultrasound and those by MRI. The ICC values showed very good agreement (range, 0.80–0.97). There was a significant positive bias for LUG on the left side and muscle thickness on the right side of the vagina. Conclusion: These results suggest that 3D ultrasound could be used instead of MRI when evaluating static pelvic floor anatomy in women without pelvic organ prolapse at rest.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherWileyen_US
dc.subjectlevator hiatus dimensionsen_US
dc.subjectmagnetic resonance imagingen_US
dc.subjectperineal ultrasounden_US
dc.subjectpubovisceral muscleen_US
dc.subjectvalidation studyen_US
dc.titleValidation of three-dimensional perineal ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging measurements of the pubovisceral muscle at resten_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.typePeer revieweden_US
dc.subject.nsiVDP::Medical disciplines: 700en_US
dc.source.pagenumber715-722en_US


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel