Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorBoyer, K.
dc.contributor.authorFederolf, Peter
dc.contributor.authorLin, C.
dc.contributor.authorNigg, Benno
dc.contributor.authorAndriacchi, T. P.
dc.date.accessioned2013-01-03T09:25:32Z
dc.date.available2013-01-03T09:25:32Z
dc.date.issued2012
dc.identifierSeksjon for fysisk prestasjonsevne / Department of Physical Performance
dc.identifier.citationJournal of Biomechanics. 2012, 45(9), 1619-1624no_NO
dc.identifier.issn0021-9290
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11250/171092
dc.descriptionI Brage finner du siste tekst-versjon av artikkelen, og den kan inneholde ubetydelige forskjeller fra forlagets pdf-versjon. Forlagets pdf-versjon finner du på www.sciencedirect.com: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiomech.2012.04.010 / In Brage you'll find the final text version of the article, and it may contain insignificant differences from the journal's pdf version. The definitive version is available at www.sciencedirect.com: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiomech.2012.04.010no_NO
dc.description.abstractA recently described variable-stiffness shoe has been shown to reduce the adduction moment and pain in patients with medial-compartment knee osteoarthritis. The mechanism associated with how this device modifies overall gait patterns to reduce the adduction moment is not well understood. Yet this information is important for applying load modifying intervention for the treatment of knee osteoarthritis. A principal component analysis (PCA) was used to test the hypothesis that there are differences in the frontal plane kinematics that are correlated with differences in the ground reaction forces (GRFs) and center of pressure (COP) for a variable-stiffness compared to a constant-stiffness control shoe. Eleven healthy adults were tested in a constant-stiffness control shoe and a variable-stiffness shoe while walking at self-selected speeds. The PCA was performed on trial vectors consisting of all kinematic, GRF and COP data. The projection of trial vectors onto the linear combination of four PCs showed there were significant differences between shoes. The interpretation of the PCs indicated an increase in the ankle eversion, knee abduction and adduction, decreases in the hip adduction and pelvic obliquity angles and reduced excursion of both the COP and peak medial–lateral GRFs for the variable-stiffness compared to the control shoe. The variable-stiffness shoe produced a unique dynamic change in the frontal plane motion of the ankle, hip and pelvis that contributed to changes in the GRF and COP and thus reduced the adduction moment at a critical instant during gait suggesting a different mechanism that was seen with fixed interventions (e.g. wedges).no_NO
dc.language.isoengno_NO
dc.publisherElsevierno_NO
dc.subjectvariable-stiffness shoeno_NO
dc.subjectkinematicsno_NO
dc.subjectosteoarthritisno_NO
dc.subjectwalkingno_NO
dc.subjectknee adduction momentno_NO
dc.titleKinematic adaptations to a variable stiffness shoe: mechanisms for reducing joint loadingno_NO
dc.typeJournal articleno_NO
dc.typePeer reviewedno_NO
dc.subject.nsiVDP::Technology: 500no_NO
dc.source.pagenumber1619-1624no_NO
dc.source.volume45no_NO
dc.source.journalJournal of Biomechanicsno_NO
dc.source.issue9no_NO


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel