Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorAckland, Timothy R.
dc.contributor.authorLohman, Timothy G.
dc.contributor.authorSundgot-Borgen, Jorunn
dc.contributor.authorMaughan, Ronald J.
dc.contributor.authorMeyer, Nanna L.
dc.contributor.authorStewart, Arthur D.
dc.contributor.authorMuller, Wolfram
dc.date.accessioned2013-04-11T08:12:55Z
dc.date.available2013-04-11T08:12:55Z
dc.date.issued2012
dc.identifierSeksjon for idrettsmedisinske fag / Department of Sports Medicine
dc.identifier.citationSports Medicine. 2012, 42, 227-249no_NO
dc.identifier.issn1179-2035
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11250/171130
dc.descriptionI Brage finner du siste tekst-versjon av artikkelen, og den kan inneholde ubetydelige forskjeller fra forlagets pdf-versjon. Forlagets pdf-versjon finner du på link.springer.com: http://dx.doi.org/10.2165/11597140-000000000-00000 / In Brage you'll find the final text version of the article, and it may contain insignificant differences from the journal's pdf version. The definitive version is available at link.springer.com: http://dx.doi.org/10.2165/11597140-000000000-00000no_NO
dc.description.abstractQuantifying human body composition has played an important role in monitoring all athlete performance and training regimens, but especially so in gravitational, weight class and aesthetic sports wherein the tissue composition of the body profoundly affects performance or adjudication. Over the past century, a myriad of techniques and equations have been proposed, but all have some inherent problems, whether in measurement methodology or in the assumptions they make. To date, there is no universally applicable criterion or `gold standard' methodology for body composition assessment. Having considered issues of accuracy, repeatability and utility, the multicomponent model might be employed as a performance or selection criterion, provided the selected model accounts for variability in the density of fat-free mass in its computation. However, when profiling change in interventions, single methods whose raw data are surrogates for body composition (with the notable exception of the body mass index) remain useful.no_NO
dc.language.isoengno_NO
dc.publisherAdis Data Informationno_NO
dc.subjectbody compositionno_NO
dc.subjectanthropometryno_NO
dc.subjectadipose tissuesno_NO
dc.subjectathletesno_NO
dc.subjectenergy metabolismno_NO
dc.subjectbioelectric impedanceno_NO
dc.subjectmagnetic resonance imagingno_NO
dc.subjectplethysmographyno_NO
dc.subjectskinfold thicknessno_NO
dc.subjecttomographyno_NO
dc.subjectultrasonic imagingno_NO
dc.subjecturine analysisno_NO
dc.subjectbody mass indexno_NO
dc.subjectlean body massno_NO
dc.subjecthydrostatic weighingno_NO
dc.subjectx-ray densitometryno_NO
dc.titleCurrent status of body composition assessment in sport: review and position statement on behalf of the ad hoc Research Working Group on Body Composition Health and Performance, under the auspices of the IOC Medical Commissionno_NO
dc.typeJournal articleno_NO
dc.typePeer reviewedno_NO
dc.subject.nsiVDP::Social science: 200::Social science in sports: 330no_NO
dc.source.journalSports Medicine
dc.identifier.doi10.2165/11597140-000000000-00000


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel