Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorBø, Kari
dc.contributor.authorØglund, Guro Pauck
dc.contributor.authorSletner, Line
dc.contributor.authorJenum, Anne Karen
dc.date.accessioned2013-05-10T07:51:50Z
dc.date.available2013-05-10T07:51:50Z
dc.date.issued2012-07-25
dc.identifierSeksjon for idrettsmedisinske fag / Department of Sports Medicine
dc.identifier.citationBJOG: an International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology. 2012, 119(11), 1354-1360no_NO
dc.identifier.issn1471-0528
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11250/171146
dc.descriptionI Brage finner du siste tekst-versjon av artikkelen, og den kan inneholde ubetydelige forskjeller fra forlagets pdf-versjon. Forlagets pdf-versjon finner du på onlinelibrary.wiley.com: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-0528.2012.03435.x / In Brage you'll find the final text version of the article, and it may contain insignificant differences from the journal's pdf version. The definitive version is available at onlinelibrary.wiley.com: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-0528.2012.03435.xno_NO
dc.description.abstractOBJECTIVES: To investigate prevalence of urinary incontinence (UI) in a multi-ethnic population of pregnant women, and to analyse for possible associations of the known risk factors for UI in such a population. DESIGN: Population-based cross-sectional study. SETTING: All pregnant women in three administrative city districts attending the Child Health Clinics. POPULATION AND SAMPLE: Out of 823 women identified in the [corrected] first trimester, 772 (94%) [corrected] agreed to participate in the study at 28 weeks of gestation. Inclusion criteria were: healthy women at 20 weeks of gestation or less and able to communicate in Norwegian, Arabic, English, Sorani, Somali, Tamil, Turkish, Urdu or Vietnamese. METHODS: Differences between ethnic groups were tested by simple descriptive statistics. Associations were estimated by logistic regression analysis and presented as crude (cOR) and adjusted (aOR) odds ratios. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Prevalence of UI as ascertained using the International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire-urinary incontinence-short form. RESULTS: Prevalence rates of UI at 28 weeks of gestation were 26% for women of African origin, 36% for women of Middle Eastern origin, 40% for women of East Asian origin, 43% for women of South Asian origin and 45% for women of European/North American origin. The difference was significant between women of African and European/North American origins (P = 0.011) and between women of African and South Asian origins (P = 0.035). Age (aOR 1.05; 95% CI 1.01-1.09) and parity (aOR 2.34; 95% CI 1.66-3.28) were positively associated with the prevalence of UI in pregnancy. Women of African origin had significantly reduced odds for UI (aOR 0.42; 95% CI 0.20-0.87). East Asian and African women reported the highest perceived impact of UI in pregnancy. CONCLUSIONS: A high prevalence of UI was found in a multi-ethnic pregnant population.no_NO
dc.language.isoengno_NO
dc.publisherJohn Wiley & Sonsno_NO
dc.subjectcross-sectional studiesno_NO
dc.subjectethnic groupsno_NO
dc.subjectNorwayno_NO
dc.subjectepidemiologyno_NO
dc.subjectpregnancyno_NO
dc.subjectpregnancy complicationsno_NO
dc.subjectprevalenceno_NO
dc.subjectquestionnairesno_NO
dc.subjectrisk factorsno_NO
dc.subjecturinary incontinenceno_NO
dc.titleThe prevalence of urinary incontinence in pregnancy among a multi-ethnic population resident in Norwayno_NO
dc.typeJournal articleno_NO
dc.typePeer reviewedno_NO
dc.subject.nsiVDP::Medical disciplines: 700::Clinical medical disciplines: 750::Gynecology and obstetrics: 756no_NO
dc.source.journalBJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/j.1471-0528.2012.03435.x


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel