Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorGranan, Lars-Petter
dc.contributor.authorInacio, Maria C. S.
dc.contributor.authorMaletis, Gregory B.
dc.contributor.authorFunahashi, Tadashi T.
dc.contributor.authorEngebretsen, Lars
dc.date.accessioned2013-10-28T14:17:12Z
dc.date.available2013-10-28T14:17:12Z
dc.date.issued2012-12
dc.identifierSeksjon for idrettsmedisinske fag / Department of Sports Medicine
dc.identifier.citationActa Orthopaedica. 2012, 83, 577-582no_NO
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11250/171264
dc.descriptionOpen Access - This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the source is credited.no_NO
dc.description.abstractBACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Patient and implant registries are important clinical tools in monitoring and benchmarking quality of care. For comparisons amongst registries to be valid, a common data set with comparable definitions is necessary. In this study we compared the patients in the Norwegian Knee Ligament Registry (NKLR) and the Kaiser Permanente Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Registry (KP ACLRR) with regard to intraarticular findings, procedures, and graft fixation characteristics reported by the operating surgeon for both primary and revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstructions (ACLRs). CONCLUSIONS: Baseline findings between the NKLR and the KP ACLRR were congruent regarding patient characteristics and most injury patterns, adding to the evidence that comparisons and collaborations between these registries will provide generalizable information to the international orthopedic community. The variation in the treatment, including graft and implant selection and meniscus procedures, between the 2 registries provides opportunities to explore the impact of treatment choices on the outcomes of ACLRs.no_NO
dc.language.isoengno_NO
dc.publisherInforma Healtcareno_NO
dc.subjectadolescentno_NO
dc.subjectadultno_NO
dc.subjectage factorsno_NO
dc.subjectanterior cruciate ligament, injuries/surgeryno_NO
dc.subjectanterior cruciate ligament reconstruction, methods/statistics & numerical datano_NO
dc.subjectcross-sectional studiesno_NO
dc.subjectcultural characteristicsno_NO
dc.subjectfemaleno_NO
dc.subjectfollow-up studiesno_NO
dc.subjectgeographyno_NO
dc.subjecthumansno_NO
dc.subjectincidenceno_NO
dc.subjectinjury severity scoreno_NO
dc.subjectintraoperative complications, diagnosisno_NO
dc.subjectknee injuries, epidemiology/surgeryno_NO
dc.subjectmaleno_NO
dc.subjectmonitoring, intraoperative - methodsno_NO
dc.subjectNorwayno_NO
dc.subjectregistriesno_NO
dc.subjectrisk assessmentno_NO
dc.subjectsex factorsno_NO
dc.subjecttreatment outcomeno_NO
dc.subjectUnited Statesno_NO
dc.subjectyoung adultno_NO
dc.titleIntraoperative findings and procedures in culturally and geographically different patient and surgeon populations: An anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction registry comparison between Norway and the USAno_NO
dc.typeJournal articleno_NO
dc.typePeer reviewedno_NO
dc.subject.nsiVDP::Medical disciplines: 700::Clinical medical disciplines: 750no_NO
dc.source.journalActa Orthopaedicano_NO
dc.identifier.doi10.3109/17453674.2012.741451


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel