dc.contributor.author | Sancho, M. F. | |
dc.contributor.author | Pascoal, Augusto Gil | |
dc.contributor.author | Mota, Patrícia | |
dc.contributor.author | Bø, Kari | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2016-06-07T10:55:45Z | |
dc.date.available | 2016-06-07T10:55:45Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2015-09 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Physiotherapy. 2015, 101, 286–291 | nb_NO |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/11250/2391688 | |
dc.description | I Brage finner du siste tekst-versjon av artikkelen, og den kan inneholde ubetydelige forskjeller fra forlagets pdf-versjon. Forlagets pdf-versjon finner du på www.sciencedirect.com: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.physio.2015.04.004 / In Brage you'll find the final text version of the article, and it may contain insignificant differences from the journal's pdf version. The definitive version is available at www.sciencedirect.com: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.physio.2015.04.004 | nb_NO |
dc.description.abstract | Objectives:
To compare inter-rectus distance (IRD) at rest between women who had a vaginal delivery with women who had a caesarean section, and to describe the effect of different abdominal exercises on IRD.
Setting:
Physiotherapy practice.
Design:
Cross-sectional experimental study.
Participants:
Thirty-eight postpartum primiparous mothers with a singleton baby (vaginal delivery: n = 23; caesarean section: n = 15).
Interventions:
Two-dimensional ultrasound images from the abdominal wall were recorded at rest and at the end position of abdominal crunch, drawing-in and drawing-in + abdominal crunch exercises. IRD measurements at rest, above and below the umbilicus, were compared between the two groups (vaginal delivery and caesarean section). IRD was also measured above and below the umbilicus during three abdominal exercises in both groups.
Main outcome measures:
IRD 2 cm above and below the umbilicus.
Results:
No significant differences in IRD, either above or below the umbilicus, were found between the vaginal delivery and caesarean section groups. IRD above the umbilicus was significantly reduced during abdominal crunch exercises compared with at rest {mean 21.7 [standard deviation (SD) 7.6] mm vs 25.9 (SD 9.0) mm; mean difference 4.2 mm; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.5 to 7.9}. IRD below the umbilicus was significantly greater during drawing-in exercises compared with at rest [16.0 (SD 8.1) mm vs 11.4 (SD 4.9) mm; mean difference 4.5 mm; 95% CI 1.6 to 7.4].
Conclusion:
In contrast to existing recommendations for abdominal strength training among postpartum women, this study found that abdominal crunch exercises reduced IRD, and drawing-in exercises were ineffective for reducing IRD. Further basic studies and randomised controlled trials are warranted to explore the effect of abdominal training on IRD. | nb_NO |
dc.language.iso | eng | nb_NO |
dc.publisher | Elsevier | nb_NO |
dc.subject | diastasis recti | nb_NO |
dc.subject | exercise | nb_NO |
dc.subject | inter-rectus distance | nb_NO |
dc.subject | caesarean section | nb_NO |
dc.subject | postpartum women | nb_NO |
dc.subject | ultrasound | nb_NO |
dc.title | Abdominal exercises affect inter-rectus distance in postpartum women: a two-dimensional ultrasound study | nb_NO |
dc.type | Journal article | nb_NO |
dc.type | Peer reviewed | nb_NO |
dc.subject.nsi | VDP::Medical disciplines: 700 | nb_NO |
dc.subject.nsi | VDP::Medical disciplines: 700::Health sciences: 800 | nb_NO |
dc.subject.nsi | VDP::Medical disciplines: 700::Health sciences: 800::Physiotherapy: 807 | nb_NO |
dc.source.journal | Physiotherapy | nb_NO |
dc.description.localcode | Seksjon for idrettsmedisinske fag / Department of Sports Medicine | nb_NO |