Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorSancho, M. F.
dc.contributor.authorPascoal, Augusto Gil
dc.contributor.authorMota, Patrícia
dc.contributor.authorBø, Kari
dc.date.accessioned2016-06-07T10:55:45Z
dc.date.available2016-06-07T10:55:45Z
dc.date.issued2015-09
dc.identifier.citationPhysiotherapy. 2015, 101, 286–291nb_NO
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11250/2391688
dc.descriptionI Brage finner du siste tekst-versjon av artikkelen, og den kan inneholde ubetydelige forskjeller fra forlagets pdf-versjon. Forlagets pdf-versjon finner du på www.sciencedirect.com: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.physio.2015.04.004 / In Brage you'll find the final text version of the article, and it may contain insignificant differences from the journal's pdf version. The definitive version is available at www.sciencedirect.com: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.physio.2015.04.004nb_NO
dc.description.abstractObjectives: To compare inter-rectus distance (IRD) at rest between women who had a vaginal delivery with women who had a caesarean section, and to describe the effect of different abdominal exercises on IRD. Setting: Physiotherapy practice. Design: Cross-sectional experimental study. Participants: Thirty-eight postpartum primiparous mothers with a singleton baby (vaginal delivery: n = 23; caesarean section: n = 15). Interventions: Two-dimensional ultrasound images from the abdominal wall were recorded at rest and at the end position of abdominal crunch, drawing-in and drawing-in + abdominal crunch exercises. IRD measurements at rest, above and below the umbilicus, were compared between the two groups (vaginal delivery and caesarean section). IRD was also measured above and below the umbilicus during three abdominal exercises in both groups. Main outcome measures: IRD 2 cm above and below the umbilicus. Results: No significant differences in IRD, either above or below the umbilicus, were found between the vaginal delivery and caesarean section groups. IRD above the umbilicus was significantly reduced during abdominal crunch exercises compared with at rest {mean 21.7 [standard deviation (SD) 7.6] mm vs 25.9 (SD 9.0) mm; mean difference 4.2 mm; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.5 to 7.9}. IRD below the umbilicus was significantly greater during drawing-in exercises compared with at rest [16.0 (SD 8.1) mm vs 11.4 (SD 4.9) mm; mean difference 4.5 mm; 95% CI 1.6 to 7.4]. Conclusion: In contrast to existing recommendations for abdominal strength training among postpartum women, this study found that abdominal crunch exercises reduced IRD, and drawing-in exercises were ineffective for reducing IRD. Further basic studies and randomised controlled trials are warranted to explore the effect of abdominal training on IRD.nb_NO
dc.language.isoengnb_NO
dc.publisherElseviernb_NO
dc.subjectdiastasis rectinb_NO
dc.subjectexercisenb_NO
dc.subjectinter-rectus distancenb_NO
dc.subjectcaesarean sectionnb_NO
dc.subjectpostpartum womennb_NO
dc.subjectultrasoundnb_NO
dc.titleAbdominal exercises affect inter-rectus distance in postpartum women: a two-dimensional ultrasound studynb_NO
dc.typeJournal articlenb_NO
dc.typePeer reviewednb_NO
dc.subject.nsiVDP::Medical disciplines: 700nb_NO
dc.subject.nsiVDP::Medical disciplines: 700::Health sciences: 800nb_NO
dc.subject.nsiVDP::Medical disciplines: 700::Health sciences: 800::Physiotherapy: 807nb_NO
dc.source.journalPhysiotherapynb_NO
dc.description.localcodeSeksjon for idrettsmedisinske fag / Department of Sports Medicinenb_NO


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel