2016 Consensus statement on return to sport from the First World Congress in Sports Physical Therapy, Bern
Ardern, Clare L.; Glasgow, Philip; Schneiders, Anthony; Witvrouw, Erik; Clarsen, Benjamin Matthew; Cools, Ann; Gojanovic, Boris; Griffin, Steffan; Khan, Karim M.; Moksnes, Håvard; Mutch, Stephen A.; Phillips, Nicola; Reurink, Gustaaf; Sadler, Robin; Silbernagel, Karin Grävare; Thorborg, Kristian; Wangensteen, Arnlaug; Wilk, Kevin E.; Bizzini, Mario
Journal article, Peer reviewed
View/ Open
Date
2016Metadata
Show full item recordCollections
- Artikler / Articles [2120]
Abstract
Deciding when to return to sport after injury is complex and multifactorial—an exercise in risk management. Return to sport decisions are made every day by clinicians, athletes and coaches, ideally in a collaborative way. The purpose of this consensus statement was to present and synthesise current evidence to make recommendations for return to sport decision-making, clinical practice and future research directions related to returning athletes to sport. A half day meeting was held in Bern, Switzerland, after the First World Congress in Sports Physical Therapy. 17 expert clinicians participated. 4 main sections were initially agreed upon, then participants elected to join 1 of the 4 groups—each group focused on 1 section of the consensus statement. Participants in each group discussed and summarised the key issues for their section before the 17-member group met again for discussion to reach consensus on the content of the 4 sections. Return to sport is not a decision taken in isolation at the end of the recovery and rehabilitation process. Instead, return to sport should be viewed as a continuum, paralleled with recovery and rehabilitation. Biopsychosocial models may help the clinician make sense of individual factors that may influence the athlete's return to sport, and the Strategic Assessment of Risk and Risk Tolerance framework may help decision-makers synthesise information to make an optimal return to sport decision. Research evidence to support return to sport decisions in clinical practice is scarce. Future research should focus on a standardised approach to defining, measuring and reporting return to sport outcomes, and identifying valuable prognostic factors for returning to sport.
Description
Copyright © 2017 BMJ Publishing Group
Publisher
BMJ Publishing GroupJournal
British Journal of Sports MedicineRelated items
Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.
-
An examination of training load, match activities, and health problems in Norwegian youth elite handball players over one competitive season
Bjørndal, Christian T.; Bache-Mathiesen, Lena Kristin; Gjesdal, Siv; Moseid, Christine Holm; Myklebust, Grethe; Luteberget, Live (Peer reviewed; Journal article, 2021)Talent development is integral to the policy and organizational practice of competitive sport, but has also been associated with excessive amounts of training and competition, and athlete injuries and illnesses. The lack ... -
Developmental outcomes for young people participating in informal and lifestyle sports: A scoping review of the literature, 2000–2020
Säfvenbom, Reidar; Strittmatter, Anna-Maria; Bernhardsen, Guro Pauck (Peer reviewed; Journal article, 2023)The aim of this study is to review the literature on lifestyle sports and lifestyle sport contexts with regard to the developmental potential they may represent in young people’s everyday lives. The review applies a ... -
Idrett og etikk : en oversikt over hovedtemaer i den idrettsfilosofiske diskusjon 1980-2007
Breivik, Gunnar (Peer reviewed; Journal article, 2009-03)Sport has become important in modern societies, both mass sport as well as elite sport. Especially elite sport raises ethical dilemmas that reach far beyond sport. The most thorough scholarly discussion of sport ethics ...