Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorvan Loo, Christiana M. T.
dc.contributor.authorOkely, Anthony D.
dc.contributor.authorBatterham, Marijka
dc.contributor.authorHinkley, Tina
dc.contributor.authorEkelund, Ulf
dc.contributor.authorBrage, Søren
dc.contributor.authorReilly, John J.
dc.contributor.authorPeoples, Gregory E.
dc.contributor.authorJones, Rachel
dc.contributor.authorJanssen, Xanne
dc.contributor.authorCliff, Dylan P.
dc.date.accessioned2017-08-29T13:13:38Z
dc.date.available2017-08-29T13:13:38Z
dc.date.issued2016-06
dc.identifier.citationJournal of Physical Activity and Health. 2016, 13, S78-S83nb_NO
dc.identifier.issn1543-5474
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11250/2452252
dc.descriptionI Brage finner du siste tekst-versjon av artikkelen, og den kan inneholde ubetydelige forskjeller fra forlagets pdf-versjon. Forlagets pdf-versjon finner du på journals.humankinetics.com / In Brage you'll find the final text version of the article, and it may contain insignificant differences from the journal's pdf version. The definitive version is available at journals.humankinetics.comnb_NO
dc.description.abstractBackground: To validate the activPAL3 algorithm for predicting metabolic equivalents (TAMETs) and classifying MVPA in 5- to 12-year-old children. Methods: Fifty-seven children (9.2 ± 2.3y, 49.1% boys) completed 14 activities including sedentary behaviors (SB), light (LPA) and moderate-to-vigorous physical activities (MVPA). Indirect calorimetry (IC) was used as the criterion measure. Analyses included equivalence testing, Bland-Altman procedures and area under the receiver operating curve (ROC-AUC). Results: At the group level, TAMETs were significantly equivalent to IC for handheld e-game, writing/coloring, and standing class activity (P < .05). Overall, TAMETs were overestimated for SB (7.9 ± 6.7%) and LPA (1.9 ± 20.2%) and underestimated for MVPA (27.7 ± 26.6%); however, classification accuracy of MVPA was good (ROC-AUC = 0.86). Limits of agreement were wide for all activities, indicating large individual error (SB: −27.6% to 44.7%; LPA: −47.1% to 51.0%; MVPA: −88.8% to 33.9%). Conclusions: TAMETs were accurate for some SB and standing, but were overestimated for overall SB and LPA, and underestimated for MVPA. Accuracy for classifying MVPA was, however, acceptablenb_NO
dc.language.isoengnb_NO
dc.publisherHuman Kineticsnb_NO
dc.subjectenergy expenditurenb_NO
dc.subjectphysical activitynb_NO
dc.subjectaccelerometrynb_NO
dc.subjectcalorimetrynb_NO
dc.subjectsedentary behaviornb_NO
dc.titlePredictive validity of a thigh-worn accelerometer METs algorithm in 5- to 12-year-old childrennb_NO
dc.typeJournal articlenb_NO
dc.typePeer reviewednb_NO
dc.source.journalJournal of Physical Activity and Health
dc.identifier.doi10.1123/jpah.2015-0721
dc.description.localcodeSeksjon for idrettsmedisinske fag / Department of Sports Medicinenb_NO


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel