Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorLopez, Garcia
dc.contributor.authorBrønd, Jan Christian
dc.contributor.authorAndersen, Lars Bo
dc.contributor.authorDencker, Magnus
dc.contributor.authorArvidsson, Daniel
dc.date.accessioned2018-05-15T09:42:34Z
dc.date.available2018-05-15T09:42:34Z
dc.date.created2018-01-15T12:53:53Z
dc.date.issued2017
dc.identifier.citationScandinavian Journal of Medicine & Science in Sports. 2017, 28, 487-495.nb_NO
dc.identifier.issn0905-7188
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11250/2498135
dc.descriptionI Brage finner du siste tekst-versjon av artikkelen, og den kan inneholde ubetydelige forskjeller fra forlagets pdf-versjon. Forlagets pdf-versjon finner du på wiley.com / In Brage you'll find the final text version of the article, and it may contain insignificant differences from the journal's pdf version. The definitive version is available at wiley.comnb_NO
dc.description.abstractSenseWear Armband (SW) is a multisensor monitor to assess physical activity and energy expenditure. Its prediction algorithms have been updated periodically. The aim was to validate SW in children, adolescents, and adults. The most recent SW algorithm 5.2 (SW5.2) and the previous version 2.2 (SW2.2) were evaluated for estimation of energy expenditure during semi-structured activities in 35 children, 31 adolescents, and 36 adults with indirect calorimetry as reference. Energy expenditure estimated from waist-worn ActiGraph GT3X+ data (AG) was used for comparison. Improvements in measurement errors were demonstrated with SW5.2 compared to SW2.2, especially in children and for biking. The overall mean absolute percent error with SW5.2 was 24% in children, 23% in adolescents, and 20% in adults. The error was larger for sitting and standing (23%-32%) and for basketball and biking (19%-35%), compared to walking and running (8%-20%). The overall mean absolute error with AG was 28% in children, 22% in adolescents, and 28% in adults. The absolute percent error for biking was 32%-74% with AG. In general, SW and AG underestimated energy expenditure. However, both methods demonstrated a proportional bias, with increasing underestimation for increasing energy expenditure level, in addition to the large individual error. SW provides measures of energy expenditure level with similar accuracy in children, adolescents, and adults with the improvements in the updated algorithms. Although SW captures biking better than AG, these methods share remaining measurements errors requiring further improvements for accurate measures of physical activity and energy expenditure in clinical and epidemiological research.nb_NO
dc.description.abstractValidation of SenseWear Armband in children, adolescents, and adultsnb_NO
dc.language.isoengnb_NO
dc.subjectActiGraphnb_NO
dc.subjectenergy expenditurenb_NO
dc.subjectindirect calorimetrynb_NO
dc.subjectmultisensornb_NO
dc.subjectphysical activitynb_NO
dc.titleValidation of SenseWear Armband in children, adolescents, and adultsnb_NO
dc.title.alternativeValidation of SenseWear Armband in children, adolescents, and adultsnb_NO
dc.typeJournal articlenb_NO
dc.typePeer reviewednb_NO
dc.description.versionacceptedVersionnb_NO
dc.source.pagenumber487-495nb_NO
dc.source.volume28nb_NO
dc.source.journalScandinavian Journal of Medicine & Science in Sportsnb_NO
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/sms.12920
dc.identifier.cristin1542837
dc.description.localcodeSeksjon for idrettsmedisinske fag / Department of Sport Medicinenb_NO
cristin.unitcode150,34,0,0
cristin.unitnameSeksjon for idrettsmedisinske fag
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextpostprint
cristin.qualitycode2


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel