Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorWörner, Tobias
dc.contributor.authorThorborg, Kristian
dc.contributor.authorMoksnes, Håvard
dc.contributor.authorEek, Frida
dc.date.accessioned2018-05-23T10:33:57Z
dc.date.available2018-05-23T10:33:57Z
dc.date.created2018-01-17T10:33:01Z
dc.date.issued2017
dc.identifier.citationKnee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy. 2017, under utgivelse. doi:10.1007/s00167-017-4676-6nb_NO
dc.identifier.issn0942-2056
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11250/2498852
dc.descriptionThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.nb_NO
dc.description.abstractPurpose: The rising number of hip arthroscopies (HA) is leading to increasing numbers of patients requiring postsurgical rehabilitation; however, evidence regarding postoperative rehabilitation is currently limited. The purpose of the study was to describe and compare current rehabilitation strategies and views among surgeons and physiotherapists in Scandinavia. Methods: Scandinavian surgeons and physiotherapists experienced with HA and post-surgical rehabilitation were asked to complete an online survey. Ninety clinicians (28 surgeons, 62 physiotherapists) responded. Results: Both professions mostly rated physiotherapy as very or extremely important in the rehabilitation process. The majority advocated criteria-based or combined criteriaand time-based progression. Expected rehabilitation timelines were reported with large intra-professional variation but general inter-professional agreement. However, compared with physiotherapists surgeons expected fewer weeks on crutches and faster return to competitive sport. Surgeons more often reported use of evidence-based self-reported outcomes while physiotherapists more often evaluated readiness for return to play. Conclusions: Among surgeons and physiotherapists, physiotherapy is considered very important following HA. Generally, very similar views were held between professions. Surgeons expected reduced time on crutches and to return to competitive sports than physiotherapists. Surgeons also used evidence-based self-reported outcomes to a higher degree than physiotherapists. Being the first study to provide an overview on currently applied rehabilitation strategies following HA, results of this study may guide much needed, future research on the rehabilitation process following HA.nb_NO
dc.language.isoengnb_NO
dc.subjecthip jointnb_NO
dc.subjectFAInb_NO
dc.subjectarthroscopynb_NO
dc.subjectrehabilitationnb_NO
dc.subjectphysiotherapynb_NO
dc.titleSimilar views on rehabilitation following hip arthroscopy among physiotherapists and surgeons in Scandinavia: A specialized care surveynb_NO
dc.title.alternativeSimilar views on rehabilitation following hip arthroscopy among physiotherapists and surgeons in Scandinavia: a specialized care surveynb_NO
dc.typeJournal articlenb_NO
dc.typePeer reviewednb_NO
dc.description.versionpublishedVersionnb_NO
dc.rights.holder© The Author(s) 2017nb_NO
dc.source.pagenumber8nb_NO
dc.source.journalKnee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopynb_NO
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s00167-017-4676-6
dc.identifier.cristin1545023
dc.description.localcodeSeksjon for idrettsmedisinske fag / Department of Sport Medicinenb_NO
cristin.unitcode150,34,0,0
cristin.unitnameSeksjon for idrettsmedisinske fag
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.qualitycode1


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel