Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorvan Loo, Christiana M. T.
dc.contributor.authorOkely, Anthony D.
dc.contributor.authorBatterham, Marijka
dc.contributor.authorHinkley, Trina
dc.contributor.authorEkelund, Ulf
dc.contributor.authorBrage, Søren
dc.contributor.authorReilly, John J.
dc.contributor.authorPeoples, Gregory E.
dc.contributor.authorJones, Rachel A.
dc.contributor.authorJanssen, Xanne
dc.contributor.authorCliff, Dylan P.
dc.date.accessioned2018-11-06T09:48:53Z
dc.date.available2018-11-06T09:48:53Z
dc.date.created2017-02-03T11:32:31Z
dc.date.issued2017
dc.identifier.citationJournal of Science and Medicine in Sport. 2017, 20, 55-59.nb_NO
dc.identifier.issn1440-2440
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11250/2571196
dc.descriptionI Brage finner du siste tekst-versjon av artikkelen, og den kan inneholde ubetydelige forskjeller fra forlagets pdf-versjon. Forlagets pdf-versjon finner du på sciencedirect.com / In Brage you'll find the final text version of the article, and it may contain insignificant differences from the journal's pdf version. The definitive version is available at sciencedirect.comnb_NO
dc.description.abstractObjectives: This study aimed to validate SenseWear Mini software algorithm versions 2.2 (SW2.2) and 5.2 (SW5.2) for estimating energy expenditure (EE) in children. Design: Laboratory-based validation study. Methods: 57 children aged 5−12 y completed a protocol involving 15 semi-structured sedentary (SED), light-intensity (LPA), and moderate- to vigorous-intensity (MVPA) physical activities. EE was estimated using portable indirect calorimetry (IC). The accuracy of EE estimates (kcal·min−1) from SW2.2 and SW5.2 were examined at the group level and individual level using the mean absolute percentage error (MAPE), Bland-Altman plots and equivalence testing. Results: MAPE values were lower for SW5.2 (30.1 ± 10.7%) than for SW2.2 (44.0 ± 6.2%). Although mean differences for SW5.2 were smaller than for SW2.2 during SED (−0.23 ± 0.22 vs. −0.61 ± 0.20 kcal·min−1), LPA (−0.69 ± 0.76 vs. −1.07 ± 0.46 kcal·min−1) and MVPA (−2.22 ± 1.15 vs. −2.57 ± 1.15 kcal·min−1), limits of agreement did not decrease for the updated algorithms. For all activities, SW2.2 and SW5.2 were not equivalent to IC (p > 0.05). Errors increased with increasing intensity. Conclusion: The current SenseWear Mini algorithms SW5.2 underestimated EE. The overall improved accuracy for SW5.2 was not accompanied with improved accuracy at the individual level and EE estimates were not equivalent to IC.nb_NO
dc.language.isoengnb_NO
dc.subjectenergy expenditurenb_NO
dc.subjectphysical activitynb_NO
dc.subjectaccelerometrynb_NO
dc.subjectcalorimetrynb_NO
dc.subjectvalidation studynb_NO
dc.titleValidation of the SenseWear Mini activity monitor in 5−12-year-old childrennb_NO
dc.title.alternativeValidation of the SenseWear Mini activity monitor in 5−12-year-old childrennb_NO
dc.typeJournal articlenb_NO
dc.typePeer reviewednb_NO
dc.description.versionacceptedVersionnb_NO
dc.source.pagenumber55-59nb_NO
dc.source.volume20nb_NO
dc.source.journalJournal of Science and Medicine in Sportnb_NO
dc.source.issue1nb_NO
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.jsams.2016.04.010
dc.identifier.cristin1446569
dc.description.localcodeSeksjon for idrettsmedisinske fag / Department of Sports Medicinenb_NO
cristin.unitcode150,34,0,0
cristin.unitnameSeksjon for idrettsmedisinske fag
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextpostprint
cristin.qualitycode1


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel