Does surgery reduce knee osteoarthritis, meniscal injury and subsequent complications compared with non-surgery after ACL rupture with at least 10 years follow-up? A systematic review and meta-analysis
Peer reviewed, Journal article
MetadataShow full item record
Original versionBritish Journal of Sports Medicine. 2019, 54(10), 592-598. 10.1136/bjsports-2019-100765
Objective: We compared long-term follow-up from surgical versus non-surgical treatment of ACL rupture regarding radiographic knee osteoarthritis (OA), secondary surgery, laxity and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs). Design: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Data sources: Embase, MEDLINE, CINAHL and the Cochrane Library databases. Eligibility criteria for selecting studies: Studies directly comparing the minimally invasive surgical (arthroscopy or miniarthrotomy) and non-surgical treatment of ACL rupture with at least 10 years of follow-up in adult patients were included. Results: Five studies met the eligibility criteria. A meta-analysis revealed a higher risk of radiographic knee OA and a lower risk of secondary meniscal surgery for patients in the surgical group. The risk of graft rupture/secondary ACL revision and secondary ACL reconstruction was equal in the surgical and non-surgical groups. Knee laxity was lower among patients in the surgical group in four studies. No difference was found in the PROMs (ie, International Knee Documentation Committee, Tegner, Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome, and Lysholm scores). Conclusion: The risk of radiographic knee OA was higher, but the risk of secondary meniscal injury was lower 10 years after surgical treatment of ACL rupture. The risk of graft rupture/secondary ACL revision or secondary reconstruction was unrelated to treatment type. The degree of knee laxity was reduced after surgical treatment in comparison with non-surgical treatment, while PROMs were similar. However, due to the methodological challenges highlighted in this systematic review, these findings must be interpreted with caution.
No commercial re-use.
JournalBritish Journal of Sports Medicine
Copyright© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020.
Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.
Injury rate and injury patterns among alpine European Cup athletes: are injury rates and injury patterns different between European Cup and World Cup athletes? Skaug, Kristina Lindquist (Master thesis, 2015-10-22)Alpine skiing is a popular winter sport with more than 200 million skiers worldwide (1). In 1936, at Garmich-Partenkinchen, male and female alpine skiing became a part of the official Olympic programme (2). The International ...
Head injuries in FIS World Cup alpine skiers, snowboarders and freestyle skiers: Epidemiology and video analyses of head impact injury mechanisms Steenstrup, Sophie E. (Doctoral thesis, 2019)Background: Head injuries represent a concern in skiing and snowboarding, where traumatic brain injury is the most common cause of death. We therefore wanted to describe the risk of head injuries across disciplines and sex ...
Is the Acute: Chronic Workload Ratio (ACWR) Associated with Risk of Time-Loss Injury in Professional Team Sports? A Systematic Review of Methodology, Variables and Injury Risk in Practical Situations Andrade, Renato; Wik, Eirik Halvorsen; Rebelo-Marques, Alexandre; Blanch, Peter; Whiteley, Rod; Espregueira-Mendes, João; Gabbett, Tim J. (Peer reviewed; Journal article, 2020)Background: The acute: chronic workload ratio (ACWR) is an index of the acute workload relative to the cumulative chronic workloads. The monitoring of physical workloads using the ACWR has emerged and been hypothesized as ...