Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorLuteberget, Live
dc.contributor.authorGilgien, Matthias
dc.date.accessioned2021-02-02T10:07:01Z
dc.date.available2021-02-02T10:07:01Z
dc.date.created2020-10-31T18:20:54Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.identifier.citationBMJ Open sport & exercise medicine. 2020, 6(1), Artikkel e000794.en_US
dc.identifier.issn2055-7647
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11250/2725743
dc.descriptionThis is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/en_US
dc.description.abstractBackground/Objective: Global navigation satellite systems (GNSS) and local positioning systems (LPS) are to date common tools to measure external training load in athletes. The aim of this scoping review was to map out and critically appraise the methods used to validate different GNSS and LPS used in team sports. Method: A total of 48 studies met the eligibility criteria and were included in the review. The reference systems applied in the validations, and the parameters investigated were extracted from the studies. Results: The results show a substantial range of reference systems used to validate GNSS and LPS and a substantial number of investigated parameters. The majority of the validation studies have employed relatively simple field-based research designs, with use of measure tape/known distance as reference measure for distance. Timing gates and radar guns were frequently used as reference system for average and peak speed. Fewer studies have used reference system that allow for validation of instantaneous dynamic position, such as infrared camera-based motion capture systems. Conclusions: Because most validation studies use simple and cost-effective reference systems which do not allow to quantify the exact path athletes travel and hence misjudge the true path length and speed, caution should be taken when interpreting the results of validation studies, especially when comparing results between studies. Studies validating instantaneous dynamic position-based measures is warranted, since they may have a wider application and enable comparisons both between studies and over time.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.titleValidation methods for global and local positioning-based athlete monitoring systems in team sports: a scoping reviewen_US
dc.typePeer revieweden_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.description.versionpublishedVersionen_US
dc.rights.holder© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020.en_US
dc.source.pagenumber11en_US
dc.source.volume6en_US
dc.source.journalBMJ Open sport & exercise medicineen_US
dc.source.issue1en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1136/bmjsem-2020-000794
dc.identifier.cristin1843828
dc.description.localcodeInstitutt for fysisk prestasjonsevne / Department of Physical Performanceen_US
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.qualitycode1


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel