Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorChristensen, Lene
dc.contributor.authorVøllestad, Nina Køpke
dc.contributor.authorVeierød, Marit Bragelien
dc.contributor.authorJakobsen, Vidar Eivind
dc.contributor.authorStuge, Britt
dc.contributor.authorBakke, Eva
dc.contributor.authorCabri, Jan Maria Hendrick
dc.contributor.authorRobinson, Hilde Stendal
dc.date.accessioned2021-03-19T23:01:32Z
dc.date.available2021-03-19T23:01:32Z
dc.date.created2021-02-02T10:08:59Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.identifier.citationClinical Biomechanics. 2020, 80, Artikkel 105168.en_US
dc.identifier.issn0268-0033
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11250/2734577
dc.descriptionThis is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).en_US
dc.description.abstractBackground: Pelvic girdle pain is prevalent during pregnancy, and women affected report weight-bearing activities to be their main disability. The Stork test is a commonly used single-leg-stance test. As clinicians report specific movement patterns in those with pelvic girdle pain, we aimed to investigate the influence of both pregnancy and pelvic girdle pain on performance of the Stork test. Methods: In this cross-sectional study, 25 pregnant women with pelvic girdle pain, 23 asymptomatic pregnant and 24 asymptomatic non-pregnant women underwent three-dimensional kinematic analysis of the Stork test. Linear mixed models were used to investigate between-group differences in trunk, pelvic and hip kinematics during neutral stance, weight shift, leg lift and single leg stance. Findings: Few and small significant between-group differences were found. Pregnant women with pelvic girdle pain had significantly less hip adduction during single leg stance compared to asymptomatic pregnant women (estimated marginal means (95% confidence intervals) -1.1° (−2.4°, 0.3°) and 1.0° (−0.4°, 2.4°), respectively; P = 0.03). Asymptomatic pregnant women had significantly less hip internal rotation compared to non-pregnant women 4.1° (1.6°, 6.7°) and 7.9° (5.4°, 10.4°), respectively (P = 0.04) and greater peak hip flexion angle of the lifted leg in single leg stance 80.4° (77.0°, 83.9°) and 74.1° (70.8°, 77.5°), respectively (P = 0.01). Variation in key kinematic variables was large across participants in all three groups. Interpretation: Our findings indicate that trunk, pelvic and hip movements during the Stork test are not specific to pregnancy and/or pelvic girdle pain in the 2nd trimester. Instead, movement strategies appear unique to each individual.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.subject‭pelvic girdle pain‬‬en_US
dc.subjectpregnancyen_US
dc.subjectkinematicsen_US
dc.subject‬asymptomatic pregnanten_US
dc.subjectnon-pregnanten_US
dc.subjecthip movementsen_US
dc.subjecttrunk movementsen_US
dc.subjectpelvic movements‭‬‬en_US
dc.subject‬Stork testen_US
dc.subjectGillet testen_US
dc.titleTrunk, pelvic and hip kinematics during the Stork test in pregnant women with pelvic girdle pain, asymptomatic pregnant and non-pregnant womenen_US
dc.typePeer revieweden_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.description.versionpublishedVersionen_US
dc.rights.holder‬© 2020 The Authorsen_US
dc.source.pagenumber8en_US
dc.source.volume80en_US
dc.source.journalClinical Biomechanicsen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2020.105168
dc.identifier.cristin1885719
dc.description.localcodeInstitutt for fysisk prestasjonsevne / Department of Physical Performanceen_US
dc.source.articlenumber105168en_US
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.qualitycode1


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail
Thumbnail
Thumbnail
Thumbnail
Thumbnail
Thumbnail
Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel