Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorRicardo, Luiza Isnardi Cardoso
dc.contributor.authorWendt, Andrea
dc.contributor.authorGalliano, Leony
dc.contributor.authorMuller, Werner de Andrade
dc.contributor.authorCruz, Gloria Izabel Niño
dc.contributor.authorWehrmeister, Fernando
dc.contributor.authorBrage, Soren
dc.contributor.authorEkelund, Ulf
dc.contributor.authorSilva, Inácio Crochemore M.
dc.date.accessioned2021-03-20T08:59:12Z
dc.date.available2021-03-20T08:59:12Z
dc.date.created2021-02-02T10:11:39Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.identifier.citationPLoS ONE. 2020, 15(1), Artikkel e0216017.en_US
dc.identifier.issn1932-6203
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11250/2734593
dc.descriptionThis is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.en_US
dc.description.abstractPurpose: The present study aims to estimate the minimum number of accelerometer measurement days needed to estimate habitual physical activity (PA) among 6- (2010), 18- (2011) and 30- (2012) year-old participants, belonging to three population-based Brazilian birth cohorts. Method: PA was assessed by triaxial wrist-worn GENEActiv accelerometers and the present analysis is restricted to participants with at least 6 consecutive days of measurement. Accelerometer raw data were analyzed with R-package GGIR. Description of PA measures (overall PA, moderate-to-vigorous PA (MVPA), light PA (LPA)) on weekdays and weekend days were conducted, and statistical differences were tested with chi-squared and Kruskal-Wallis tests. Spearman Brown Formulae was applied to test reliability of different number of days of accelerometer use. Results: Differences between week and weekend days regarding LPA, MVPA and overall PA, were only observed among 30-year-olds. Higher levels of MVPA (p = 0.006) and overall PA (p<0.001) were identified on weekdays. For overall PA, to achieve a reliability coefficient >0.70, two and three days of measurement were needed in adults and children, respectively. For LPA, a reliability coefficient >0.70 was achieved with five days in 6-year-old children, three days in 18-year-old young adults, and four days in 30-year-old adults. Considering MVPA, four days would be necessary to represent a week of measurement among all cohort groups. Conclusion: Our results show that four and five measurement days are needed to estimate all habitual PA constructs, for children and adults, respectively. Also, among 30-year-old adults, it is important to make efforts towards weekend days measurement.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.subjectphysical activityen_US
dc.subjectaccelerometersen_US
dc.subjectexerciseen_US
dc.subjectcohort studiesen_US
dc.subjectage groupsen_US
dc.subjectyoung adultsen_US
dc.subjectBrazilen_US
dc.subjectlow and middle income countriesen_US
dc.titleNumber of days required to estimate physical activity constructs objectively measured in different age groups: Findings from three Brazilian (Pelotas) population-based birth cohortsen_US
dc.typePeer revieweden_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.description.versionpublishedVersionen_US
dc.rights.holder© 2020 Ricardo et al.en_US
dc.source.pagenumber13en_US
dc.source.volume15en_US
dc.source.journalPLoS ONEen_US
dc.source.issue1en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1371/journal.pone.0216017
dc.identifier.cristin1885723
dc.description.localcodeInstitutt for idrettsmedisinske fag / Department of Sports Medicineen_US
dc.source.articlenumbere0216017en_US
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.qualitycode1


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel