Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorCarbonaro, Marco
dc.contributor.authorSeynnes, Olivier R.
dc.contributor.authorMaffiuletti, Nicola A.
dc.contributor.authorBusso, Chiara
dc.contributor.authorMinetto, Marco Alessandro
dc.contributor.authorBotter, Alberto
dc.date.accessioned2021-08-30T11:00:35Z
dc.date.available2021-08-30T11:00:35Z
dc.date.created2020-12-17T12:41:38Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.identifier.citationIEEE transactions on neural systems and rehabilitation engineering. 2020, 28(11), 2557-2565.en_US
dc.identifier.issn1534-4320
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11250/2771748
dc.descriptionDette er siste tekst-versjon av artikkelen, og den kan inneholde små forskjeller fra forlagets pdf-versjon. Forlagets pdf-versjon finner du her: https://doi.org/doi.org/10.1109/TNSRE.2020.3027037 / This is the final text version of the article, and it may contain minor differences from the journal's pdf version. The original publication is available here: https://doi.org/doi.org/10.1109/TNSRE.2020.3027037en_US
dc.description.abstractElectrical stimulation is widely used in rehabilitation to prevent muscle weakness and to assist the functional recovery of neural deficits. Its application is however limited by the rapid development of muscle fatigue due to the non-physiological motor unit (MU) recruitment. This issue can be mitigated by interleaving muscle belly (mStim) and nerve stimulation (nStim) to distribute the temporal recruitment among different MU groups. To be effective, this approach requires the two stimulation modalities to activate minimally-overlapped groups of MUs. In this manuscript, we investigated spatial differences between mStim and nStim MU recruitment through the study of architectural changes of superficial and deep compartments of tibialis anterior (TA). We used ultrasound imaging to measure variations in muscle thickness, pennation angle, and fiber length during mStim, nStim, and voluntary (Vol) contractions at 15% and 25% of the maximal force. For both contraction levels, architectural changes induced by nStim in the deep and superficial compartments were similar to those observed during Vol. Instead, during mStim superficial fascicles underwent a greater change compared to those observed during nStim and Vol, both in absolute magnitude and in their relative differences between compartments. These observations suggest that nStim results in a distributed MU recruitment over the entire muscle volume, similarly to Vol, whereas mStim preferentially activates the superficial muscle layer. The diversity between spatial recruitment of nStim and mStim suggests the involvement of different MU populations, which justifies strategies based on interleaved nerve/muscle stimulation to reduce muscle fatigue during electrically-induced contractions of TA.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.subjectelectric stimulationen_US
dc.subjectelectromyographyen_US
dc.subjecthumansen_US
dc.subjectmuscle contractionen_US
dc.subjectmuscle fatigueen_US
dc.subjectmuscleen_US
dc.subjectskeletalen_US
dc.subjectrecruitmenten_US
dc.subjectneurophysiologicalen_US
dc.subjectultrasonographyen_US
dc.titleArchitectural changes in superficial and deep compartments of the tibialis anterior during electrical stimulation over different sitesen_US
dc.typePeer revieweden_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.description.versionacceptedVersionen_US
dc.source.pagenumber2557-2565en_US
dc.source.volume28en_US
dc.source.journalIEEE transactions on neural systems and rehabilitation engineeringen_US
dc.source.issue11en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1109/TNSRE.2020.3027037
dc.identifier.cristin1861039
dc.description.localcodeInstitutt for fysisk prestasjonsevne / Department of Physical Performanceen_US
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextpostprint
cristin.qualitycode2


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel