Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorLauersen, Jeppe Bo
dc.contributor.authorBertelsen, Ditte Marie
dc.contributor.authorAndersen, Lars Bo
dc.date.accessioned2015-03-19T12:16:20Z
dc.date.available2015-03-19T12:16:20Z
dc.date.issued2013-10-07
dc.identifier.citationBritish Journal of Sports Medicine. 2014, 48, 871-877nb_NO
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11250/279729
dc.descriptionI Brage finner du siste tekst-versjon av artikkelen, og den kan inneholde små forskjeller fra forlagets pdf-versjon. Forlagets pdf-versjon finner du på bjsm.bmj.com: http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bjsports-2013-092538 / In Brage you'll find the final text version of the article, and it may contain minor differences from the journal's pdf version. The original publication is available at bjsm.bmj.com: http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bjsports-2013-092538nb_NO
dc.description.abstractBACKGROUND: Physical activity is important in both prevention and treatment of many common diseases, but sports injuries can pose serious problems. OBJECTIVE: To determine whether physical activity exercises can reduce sports injuries and perform stratified analyses of strength training, stretching, proprioception and combinations of these, and provide separate acute and overuse injury estimates. MATERIAL AND METHODS: PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science and SPORTDiscus were searched and yielded 3462 results. Two independent authors selected relevant randomised, controlled trials and quality assessments were conducted by all authors of this paper using the Cochrane collaboration domain-based quality assessment tool. Twelve studies that neglected to account for clustering effects were adjusted. Quantitative analyses were performed in STATA V.12 and sensitivity analysed by intention-to-treat. Heterogeneity (I(2)) and publication bias (Harbord's small-study effects) were formally tested. RESULTS: 25 trials, including 26 610 participants with 3464 injuries, were analysed. The overall effect estimate on injury prevention was heterogeneous. Stratified exposure analyses proved no beneficial effect for stretching (RR 0.963 (0.846-1.095)), whereas studies with multiple exposures (RR 0.655 (0.520-0.826)), proprioception training (RR 0.550 (0.347-0.869)), and strength training (RR 0.315 (0.207-0.480)) showed a tendency towards increasing effect. Both acute injuries (RR 0.647 (0.502-0.836)) and overuse injuries (RR 0.527 (0.373-0.746)) could be reduced by physical activity programmes. Intention-to-treat sensitivity analyses consistently revealed even more robust effect estimates. CONCLUSIONS: Despite a few outlying studies, consistently favourable estimates were obtained for all injury prevention measures except for stretching. Strength training reduced sports injuries to less than 1/3 and overuse injuries could be almost halved.nb_NO
dc.language.isoengnb_NO
dc.publisherBMJ Publishing Groupnb_NO
dc.subjectadolescentnb_NO
dc.subjectadultnb_NO
dc.subjectathletic injuries / prevention & controlnb_NO
dc.subjectchildnb_NO
dc.subjectcumulative trauma disorders / prevention & controlnb_NO
dc.subjectexercise therapy / methodsnb_NO
dc.subjectmuscle strength / physiologynb_NO
dc.subjectrandomized controlled trials as topicnb_NO
dc.subjectyoung adultnb_NO
dc.titleThe effectiveness of exercise interventions to prevent sports injuries: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trialsnb_NO
dc.typeJournal articlenb_NO
dc.typePeer reviewednb_NO
dc.subject.nsiVDP::Social science: 200::Social science in sports: 330::Other subjects within physical education: 339nb_NO
dc.source.journalBritish Journal of Sports Medicinenb_NO
dc.description.localcodeSeksjon for idrettsmedisinske fag / Department of Sports Medicinenb_NO


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel