Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorRogers, Annabelle
dc.contributor.authorHarris, Tess
dc.contributor.authorVictor, Christina
dc.contributor.authorWoodcock, Alison
dc.contributor.authorLimb, Elizabeth S.
dc.contributor.authorKerry, Sally
dc.contributor.authorIliffe, Steve
dc.contributor.authorWhincup, Peter
dc.contributor.authorEkelund, Ulf
dc.contributor.authorBeighton, Carole
dc.contributor.authorUssher, Michael
dc.contributor.authorAdams, Fredrika
dc.contributor.authorCook, Derek G.
dc.date.accessioned2015-03-20T09:21:58Z
dc.date.available2015-03-20T09:21:58Z
dc.date.issued2014-04-12
dc.identifier.citationBMC Geriatrics. 2014, 14, 46nb_NO
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11250/279924
dc.description© 2014 Rogers et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.nb_NO
dc.description.abstractBackground: Physical activity is of vital importance to older peoples’ health. Physical activity intervention studies with older people often have low recruitment, yet little is known about non-participants. Methods: Patients aged 60–74 years from three UK general practices were invited to participate in a nurse-supported pedometer-based walking intervention. Demographic characteristics of 298 participants and 690 non-participants were compared. Health status and physical activity of 298 participants and 183 non-participants who completed a survey were compared using age, sex adjusted odds ratios (OR) (95% confidence intervals). 15 non-participants were interviewed to explore perceived barriers to participation. Results: Recruitment was 30% (298/988). Participants were more likely than non-participants to be female (54% v 47%; p = 0.04) and to live in affluent postcodes (73% v 62% in top quintile; p < 0.001). Participants were more likely than non-participants who completed the survey to have an occupational pension OR 2.06 (1.35-3.13), a limiting longstanding illness OR 1.72 (1.05-2.79) and less likely to report being active OR 0.55 (0.33-0.93) or walking fast OR 0.56 (0.37-0.84). Interviewees supported general practice-based physical activity studies, particularly walking, but barriers to participation included: already sufficiently active, reluctance to walk alone or at night, physical symptoms, depression, time constraints, trial equipment and duration. Conclusion: Gender and deprivation differences suggest some selection bias. However, trial participants reported more health problems and lower activity than non-participants who completed the survey, suggesting appropriate trial selection in a general practice population. Non-participant interviewees indicated that shorter interventions, addressing physical symptoms and promoting confidence in pursuing physical activity, might increase trial recruitment and uptake of practice-based physical activity endeavours.nb_NO
dc.language.isoengnb_NO
dc.publisherBioMed Centralnb_NO
dc.subjectphysical activitynb_NO
dc.subjectnon-participationnb_NO
dc.subjectprimary carenb_NO
dc.subjectolder peoplenb_NO
dc.subjectrecruitmentnb_NO
dc.titleWhich older people decline participation in a primary care trial of physical activity and why: insights from a mixed methods approachnb_NO
dc.typeJournal articlenb_NO
dc.typePeer reviewednb_NO
dc.subject.nsiVDP::Medical disciplines: 700::Clinical medical disciplines: 750nb_NO
dc.source.journalBMC Geriatricsnb_NO
dc.description.localcodeSeksjon for idrettsmedisinske fag / Department of Sports Medicinenb_NO


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel