Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorOrme, Mark
dc.contributor.authorWijndaele, Katrien
dc.contributor.authorSharp, Stephen J.
dc.contributor.authorWestgate, Kate
dc.contributor.authorEkelund, Ulf
dc.contributor.authorBrage, Søren
dc.date.accessioned2015-06-03T08:05:48Z
dc.date.available2015-06-03T08:05:48Z
dc.date.issued2014-03-10
dc.identifier.citationInternational Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity. 2014, 11, 34nb_NO
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11250/284469
dc.description© 2014 Orme et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.nb_NO
dc.description.abstractBackground: It is difficult to compare accelerometer-derived estimates of moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (MVPA) between studies due to differences in data processing procedures. We aimed to evaluate the effects of accelerometer processing options on total and bout-accumulated time spent in MVPA in adults. Methods: 267 participants from the ProActive Trial provided 1236 days of valid physical activity (PA) data, collected using a 5-s epoch with ActiGraph GT1M accelerometers. We integrated data over 5-s to 60-s epoch lengths (EL) and applied two-level mixed effects regression models to MVPA time, defined using 1500 to 2500 counts/minute (cpm) cut-points (CP) and bout durations (BD) from 1 to 15 min. Results: Total MVPA time was lower on longer EL and higher CP (47 vs 26 min/day and 26 vs 5 min/day on 1500 vs 2500 cpm on 5-s and 60-s epoch, respectively); this could be approximated as MVPA = exp[2.197 + 0.279*log(CP) + 6.120*log(EL) - 0.869*log(CP)*log(EL)] with an 800 min/day wear-time. In contrast, EL was positively associated with time spent in bout-accumulated MVPA; the approximating equation being MVPA = exp[54.679 - 6.268*log(CP) + 6.387*log(EL) - 10.000*log(BD) - 0.162*log(EL)*log(BD) - 0.626*log(CP)*log(EL) + 1.033*log(CP)*log(BD)]. BD and CP were inversely associated with MVPA, with higher values attenuating the influence of EL. Conclusions: EL, CP and BD interact to influence estimates of accelerometer-determined MVPA. In general, higher CP and longer BD result in lower MVPA but the direction of association for EL depends on BD. Reporting scaling coefficients for these key parameters across their frequently used ranges would facilitate comparisons of population-level accelerometry estimates of MVPA.nb_NO
dc.language.isoengnb_NO
dc.publisherBioMed Centralnb_NO
dc.subjectmoderate-to-vigorousnb_NO
dc.subjectadultsnb_NO
dc.subjectmeasurementnb_NO
dc.subjectwear-timenb_NO
dc.subjectactigraphnb_NO
dc.subjectobjectivenb_NO
dc.titleCombined influence of epoch length, cut-point and bout duration on accelerometry-derived physical activitynb_NO
dc.typeJournal articlenb_NO
dc.typePeer reviewednb_NO
dc.subject.nsiVDP::Social science: 200::Social science in sports: 330nb_NO
dc.subject.nsiVDP::Medical disciplines: 700::Sports medicine: 850nb_NO
dc.source.journalInternational Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activitynb_NO
dc.description.localcodeSeksjon for idretssmedisinske fag / Department of Sports Medicinenb_NO


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel