Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorMcGawley, Kerry
dc.contributor.authorSpencer, Matthew
dc.contributor.authorOlofsson, Anna
dc.contributor.authorAndersson, Erik
dc.date.accessioned2022-03-04T09:14:56Z
dc.date.available2022-03-04T09:14:56Z
dc.date.created2021-09-01T08:32:31Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.identifier.citationInternational Journal of Sports Physiology and Performance (IJSPP). 2021, 16(8), 1140-1147.en_US
dc.identifier.issn1555-0265
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11250/2983021
dc.descriptionI Brage finner du siste tekst-versjon av artikkelen, og den kan inneholde ubetydelige forskjeller fra forlagets pdf-versjon. Forlagets pdf-versjon finner du på www.humankinetics.com / In Brage you'll find the final text version of the article, and it may contain insignificant differences from the journal's pdf version. The original publication is available at www.humankinetics.comen_US
dc.description.abstractContext: Warming up in very cold climates and maintaining an elevated body temperature prior to a race is challenging for snow-sport athletes. Purpose: To investigate the effects of active (ACT), passive (PAS), and a combination of ACT and PAS (COM) warm-ups on maximal physical performance in a subzero environment among snow-sport athletes. Methods: Ten junior alpine skiers completed 3 experimental trials in −7.2 (0.2)°C. The ACT involved 5 minutes of moderate cycling, 3 × 15-second accelerations, a 6-second sprint, 5 countermovement jumps (CMJs), and a 10-minute passive transition phase, while in PAS, participants wore a lower-body heated garment for 24 minutes. In COM, participants completed the active warm-up, then wore the heated garment during the transition phase. Two maximal CMJs and a 90-second maximal isokinetic cycling test followed the warm-up. Results: CMJ performance was likely (P =.150) and very likely (P =.013) greater in ACT and COM, respectively, versus PAS. Average power output during the cycling test was likely (P =.074) greater in ACT and COM versus PAS. Participants felt likely to almost certainly warmer (P <.01) and more comfortable (P =.161) during ACT and COM versus PAS. In addition, participants felt likely warmer (P =.136) and very likely more comfortable (P =.161) in COM versus ACT. Conclusions: COM resulted in significantly improved CMJ performance versus PAS while both ACT and COM led to likely improved 90-second cycling performance. Participants felt significantly warmer during ACT and COM versus PAS and likely warmer in COM versus ACT. Therefore, a combined warm-up is recommended for alpine skiers performing in subzero temperatures.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.subjectsportswearen_US
dc.subjectheaten_US
dc.subjectexercise testsen_US
dc.subjectclinical trialsen_US
dc.subjectathletesen_US
dc.subjectexercise physiologyen_US
dc.subjectsnowen_US
dc.subjectcomparative studiesen_US
dc.subjectcyclingen_US
dc.subjectbody movementen_US
dc.subjectdescriptive statisticsen_US
dc.subjectjumpingen_US
dc.subjectbiomechanicsen_US
dc.subjectcold temperatureen_US
dc.subjectskiingen_US
dc.subjectwarmupen_US
dc.subjectsprintingen_US
dc.titleComparing active, passive, and combined warm-ups among junior alpine skiers in -7°Cen_US
dc.typePeer revieweden_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.description.versionacceptedVersionen_US
dc.source.pagenumber1140-1147en_US
dc.source.volume16en_US
dc.source.journalInternational Journal of Sports Physiology and Performance (IJSPP)en_US
dc.source.issue8en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1123/IJSPP.2020-0300
dc.identifier.cristin1930290
dc.description.localcodeInstitutt for fysisk prestasjonsevne / Department of Physical Performanceen_US
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextpostprint
cristin.qualitycode1


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel