Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorErdvik, Irina Burchard
dc.contributor.authorMoen, Kjersti Mordal
dc.contributor.authorSäfvenbom, Reidar
dc.date.accessioned2022-03-10T12:16:42Z
dc.date.available2022-03-10T12:16:42Z
dc.date.created2021-06-24T11:21:44Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.identifier.citationEuropean Physical Education Review. 2021, Artikkel 1356336X211023536.en_US
dc.identifier.issn1356-336X
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11250/2984258
dc.descriptionThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) which permits any use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access page (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).en_US
dc.description.abstractWhile many students participate autonomously in physical education (PE), research shows that students who do not participate in leisure sport are less likely to perceive PE positively. Attempting to optimise the reciprocal student (↔) PE relationship and secure equal opportunities for learning in PE, schools in a Norwegian county developed an ‘Interest-based PE’ programme offering students a choice of two PE approaches: a sports approach (SA), focused on sports activities, and an explorative approach (EA), focused on alternative movement activities. Based on a process-relational understanding of adolescent development and learning, this study seeks a deeper understanding of changes in the PE experiences of students in the programme. Sixteen students (ages 17–18 years) who had participated in Interest-based PE for 18 months participated in qualitative semi-structured one-on-one interviews where they reflected on their relationship with PE prior to and during the programme. Data were subject to inductive interpretive thematic analysis showing that ‘the role of sports in PE’ framed student ↔ PE relations and that this sports discourse regulated the relations, also within the Interest-based PE programme. The separation of students into an EA and a SA accentuated the sports discourse and students’ sports competencies, contributing to segregation on the basis of students' confidence, competence and ability in sports. Based on this study, we question the assumption that differentiation programmes, such as Interest-based PE, will optimise student ↔ subject relations if these relations remain governed by the sports discourse, rather than the PE curriculum.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.subjectchoiceen_US
dc.subjectPEen_US
dc.subjectrelational analysisen_US
dc.subjectsporten_US
dc.subjectsports discourseen_US
dc.titleA relational perspective on students' experiences of participation in an ‘Interest-based physical education’ programmeen_US
dc.typePeer revieweden_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.description.versionpublishedVersionen_US
dc.rights.holder© The Author(s) 2021en_US
dc.source.pagenumber17en_US
dc.source.journalEuropean Physical Education Reviewen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1177/1356336X211023536
dc.identifier.cristin1918112
dc.description.localcodeInstitutt for lærerutdanning og friluftslivsstudier / Department of Teacher Education and Outdoor Studiesen_US
dc.source.articlenumber1356336X211023536en_US
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.qualitycode1


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel