Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorReid, Robert Cortas
dc.contributor.authorGilgien, Matthias
dc.contributor.authorJølstad, Petter Andre Husevåg
dc.contributor.authorGjevestad, Jon Glenn Omholt
dc.date.accessioned2022-03-22T22:01:16Z
dc.date.available2022-03-22T22:01:16Z
dc.date.created2022-02-11T09:26:27Z
dc.date.issued2022
dc.identifier.citationRemote Sensing. 2022, 14(1), Artikkel 22.en_US
dc.identifier.issn2072-4292
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11250/2986927
dc.descriptionThis article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).en_US
dc.description.abstractThe AdMos receiver from Advanced Sport Instruments is a global navigation satellite system (GNSS) frequently used in alpine ski racing, with users from national and professional teams. Therefore, a validation was conducted for use of the AdMos in alpine skiing, using data from both recreational and competitive skiers. Athletes skied a total of 60 km in different measurement and skiing conditions, while carrying both an AdMos and a differential GNSS, which was used as the gold standard. From the GNSS position data, speed, acceleration, turn radius, trajectory incline and impulse were calculated as instantaneous and turn average measures for both GNSS systems and errors between the systems were calculated. The median and interquartile range (IQR) for the instantaneous errors were below 3.5 (3.5) m for horizontal plane position and below 7.0 (4.3) m for the 3D position. The median and IQR for instantaneous errors and turn average errors, respectively, were below 0.04 (0.24)/0.04 (0.16) m/s for speed, below 0.23 (1.06)/0.35 (0.63) m/s2 for acceleration, below 0.47 (5.65)/0.73 (5.3) m for turn radius, and below 0.043 (1.96)/0.42 (1.42) degrees for trajectory incline. The median and IQR for turn average impulse were 0.025 (0.099) BWs. The position error changed gradually and randomly over time, with low noise levels causing smooth trajectories of similar shape but spatially shifted from the true trajectory that allowed the position–time derivation of the performance parameters, and detection of turns with 3% median and 5% IQR error. The accuracy assessment revealed that (1) the error levels were comparable to other consumer-grade standalone GNSS units designed for sport; (2) the trajectories closely resembled the true trajectories but with a random shift that changed over time and had a low noise level; (3) there was a very low instantaneous speed error that may allow the detection of many performance aspects of skiing and other sports; and (4) there were larger instantaneous errors for the remaining performance parameters, which decreased substantially when averaged over a turn.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.subjectaccuracyen_US
dc.subjectglobal navigation satellite systemen_US
dc.subjectGPSen_US
dc.subjectkinematicen_US
dc.subjectkineticen_US
dc.subjectphysical activityen_US
dc.subjectsporten_US
dc.subjectsport analysisen_US
dc.subjecttrackingen_US
dc.titleValidity of the AdMos, Advanced Sport Instruments, GNSS sensor for use in alpine skiingen_US
dc.typePeer revieweden_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.description.versionpublishedVersionen_US
dc.rights.holder© 2021 by the authorsen_US
dc.source.pagenumber19en_US
dc.source.volume14en_US
dc.source.journalRemote Sensingen_US
dc.source.issue1en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.3390/rs14010022
dc.identifier.cristin2000306
dc.description.localcodeInstitutt for fysisk prestasjonsevne / Department of Physical Performanceen_US
dc.source.articlenumber22en_US
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.qualitycode1


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel