Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorBuskerud, Jan-Erik
dc.contributor.authorAbrahamsen, Frank Eirik
dc.contributor.authorSolberg, Paul André
dc.date.accessioned2022-11-29T17:31:47Z
dc.date.available2022-11-29T17:31:47Z
dc.date.created2022-08-24T11:06:23Z
dc.date.issued2022
dc.identifier.citationFrontiers in Psychology. 2022, 13, Artikkel 894169.en_US
dc.identifier.issn1664-1078
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11250/3034847
dc.descriptionThis is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.en_US
dc.description.abstractHowever, there is a lack of conceptual understanding of the factors influencing performance decrements in prone shooting. The present study examines how one can simulate a combat scenario by inducing acute physical stress, ultimately impacting one’s shooting performance (SP). The relationship between participants’ physical level and SP was measured in several ways. The SP of members of the Norwegian Navy Special Operations Forces (SOF) (N = 30) was measured before and directly after acute exercise-induced stress caused by a 200-m uphill run (90% HRmax). Under acute physical stress, participants took less time to fire five rounds (total 15.5 ± 10.9 s faster), and the probability of hitting the target was unaffected (92%). In terms of more sensitive measures, score was significantly reduced and shot-group dispersion increased (64 ± 90 cm2, p < 0.01, d = 0.72), mainly due to increased vertical dispersion (2.5 ± 4.6 cm, p < 0.01, d = 0.53). Age, trait somatic anxiety and the Big Five Inventory item “openness” explained 45.2% of the variance in shooting score in the pre-physical stress condition. In the post-physical stress condition, pre-test shooting score, the number of months deployed, and shooting time predicted 32.9% of the variance in shooting score. The change in SP (pre—post) showed the concentration disruption scale was the best predictor of the reduction in shot score (20.1%). From a practical point of view, maintaining the probability of hitting the target with reduced shooting time post-physical stress could be viewed as superior performance for SOF.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.subjectcombaten_US
dc.subjectheart rateen_US
dc.subjectmarksmanshipen_US
dc.subjectmilitaryen_US
dc.subjectphysical stressen_US
dc.subjectshooting performanceen_US
dc.subjectSOFen_US
dc.titlePhysical stress and determinants of shooting performance among Norwegian Special Forces Operatorsen_US
dc.typePeer revieweden_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.description.versionpublishedVersionen_US
dc.rights.holder© 2022 Buskerud, Abrahamsen and Solbergen_US
dc.source.pagenumber9en_US
dc.source.volume13en_US
dc.source.journalFrontiers in Psychologyen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.3389/fpsyg.2022.894169
dc.identifier.cristin2045578
dc.description.localcodeInstitutt for idrett og samfunnsvitenskap / Department of Sport and Social Sciencesen_US
dc.source.articlenumber894169en_US
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.qualitycode1


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel