Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorBergum, Hilde Marie
dc.contributor.authorSandven, Irene
dc.contributor.authorAbdelnoor, Michael
dc.contributor.authorAnderssen, Sigmund Alfred
dc.contributor.authorGrimsmo, Jostein
dc.contributor.authorRivrud, Dag Elle
dc.contributor.authorMyhr, Nils Erling
dc.contributor.authorVold, Mona Bekken
dc.contributor.authorStenbakken, Cesilie Meling
dc.contributor.authorLidfors, Bengt
dc.contributor.authorDufseth, Laila
dc.contributor.authorKlemsdal, Tor Ole
dc.date.accessioned2023-03-02T14:03:33Z
dc.date.available2023-03-02T14:03:33Z
dc.date.created2022-12-25T10:22:59Z
dc.date.issued2022
dc.identifier.citationEuropean Journal of Preventive Cardiology. 2022, 29(17), Side 2252-2263.en_US
dc.identifier.issn2047-4873
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11250/3055446
dc.descriptionThis is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.en_US
dc.description.abstractAims: Cardiovascular risk factor control is suboptimal in Europe, including Norway. The present study examined the efficacy of a multimodal primary prevention intervention programme based on the existing Norwegian health care system. Methods and results: In this open-label randomized controlled trial, adult patients with elevated cardiovascular risk were randomly assigned to an intervention programme including a hospital-based lifestyle course and primary care follow-up or to a control group (CG). The participants were recruited between 2011 and 2015. Primary outcome was change in validated cardiovascular risk scores, national and international (NORRISK, NORRISK 2, Framingham, PROCAM) between baseline and follow-up. Secondary outcomes included major cardiovascular risk factors. After 36 months the NORRISK score was significantly improved in patients assigned to the intervention group (IG) compared to patients assigned to the CG; absolute difference in mean delta score in the IG (n = 305) compared to mean delta score in the CG (n = 296): −0.92, 95% CI: −1.48 to −0.36, P = 0.001. The results for NORRISK 2, Framingham and PROCAM showed similar significant effects. The secondary endpoints including total cholesterol and blood pressure were only minimally, and non-significantly, reduced in the IG, but the proportion of smokers (P = 0.0028) and with metabolic syndrome (P < 0.0001) were significantly reduced. A limited number of cardiovascular events were observed, IG (n = 9), CG (n = 16). Conclusion: In subjects with elevated cardiovascular risk, a newly developed prevention programme, combining a hospital-based lifestyle course and primary care follow-up, significantly reduced cardiovascular risk scores after 36 months. This benefit appeared achievable primarily through improvements in metabolic syndrome characteristics and smoking habits.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.subjectcardiovascular diseaseen_US
dc.subjectcardiovascular risken_US
dc.subjectlifestyle interventionen_US
dc.subjectmetabolic syndromeen_US
dc.subjectprimary preventionen_US
dc.subjectsmoking cessationen_US
dc.titleRandomized trial of cardiovascular prevention in Norway combining an in-hospital lifestyle course with primary care follow-up: The Hjerteløftet studyen_US
dc.typePeer revieweden_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.description.versionpublishedVersionen_US
dc.rights.holder© The Author(s) 2022en_US
dc.source.pagenumber2252-2263en_US
dc.source.volume29en_US
dc.source.journalEuropean Journal of Preventive Cardiologyen_US
dc.source.issue17en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1093/eurjpc/zwac211
dc.identifier.cristin2097348
dc.description.localcodeInstitutt for idrettsmedisinske fag / Department of Sports Medicineen_US
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.qualitycode2


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel