Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorKyte, Karoline Holsen
dc.contributor.authorHaakstad, Lene Annette Hagen
dc.contributor.authorHisdal, Jonny
dc.contributor.authorSunde, Andrine
dc.contributor.authorStensrud, Trine
dc.date.accessioned2023-10-12T12:53:08Z
dc.date.available2023-10-12T12:53:08Z
dc.date.created2023-03-16T14:17:15Z
dc.date.issued2023
dc.identifier.citationBMJ Open Sport & Exercise Medicine. 2023, 9(1), Artikkel e001472.en_US
dc.identifier.issn2055-7647
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11250/3096152
dc.descriptionThis is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial.en_US
dc.description.abstractObjective: The primary objective was to compare bone mineral density (BMD) in Norwegian female elite long-distance runners with a control group of inactive females. Secondary objectives were to identify cases of low BMD, to compare the concentration of bone turnover markers, vitamin D and symptoms of low energy availability (LEA) between the groups, and to identify possible associations between BMD and selected variables. Methods: Fifteen runners and fifteen controls were included. Assessments included dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry measurement of BMD in the total body, lumbar spine and dual proximal femur. Blood samples included endocrine analyses and circulating bone turnover markers. The risk of LEA was assessed through a questionnaire. Results: Runners had higher Z-scores in the dual proximal femur (1.30 (0.20 to 1.80) vs 0.20 (−0.20 to 0.80), p<0.021) and total body (1.70 (1.20 to 2.30) vs 0.90 (0.80 to 1.00), p<0.001). The lumbar spine Z-score was similar between groups (0.10 (−0.70 to 0.60) vs −0.10(−0.50 to 0.50), p=0.983). Three runners had low BMD (Z-score <−1) in the lumbar spine. Vitamin D and bone turnover markers showed no differences between the groups. Forty-seven per cent of the runners were at risk of LEA. Dual proximal femur BMD showed a positive correlation to estradiol and a negative correlation to LEA symptoms in runners. Conclusion: Norwegian female elite runners had higher BMD Z-score in the dual proximal femur and total body compared with controls, while no difference was observed in the lumbar spine. The advantages of long-distance running on bone health seem to be site specific, and there is still a need for the prevention of LEA and menstrual disorders in this group.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.subjectathleteen_US
dc.subjectbone densityen_US
dc.subjectbone mineral densityen_US
dc.subjectendocrine statusen_US
dc.subjectfemale athlete triaden_US
dc.subjectrunningen_US
dc.titleBone health in Norwegian female elite runners: A cross-sectional, controlled studyen_US
dc.typePeer revieweden_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.description.versionpublishedVersionen_US
dc.rights.holder© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2023en_US
dc.source.pagenumber7en_US
dc.source.volume9en_US
dc.source.journalBMJ Open Sport & Exercise Medicineen_US
dc.source.issue1en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1136/bmjsem-2022-001472
dc.identifier.cristin2134488
dc.description.localcodeInstitutt for idrettsmedisinske fag / Department of Sports Medicineen_US
dc.source.articlenumbere001472en_US
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.qualitycode1


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel