Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorO'Sullivan, Mark Joseph
dc.contributor.authorVaughan, James
dc.contributor.authorRumbold, James L.
dc.contributor.authorDavids, Keith
dc.date.accessioned2023-10-23T13:24:23Z
dc.date.available2023-10-23T13:24:23Z
dc.date.created2023-07-12T10:11:14Z
dc.date.issued2023
dc.identifier.citationFrontiers in Sports and Active Living. 2023, 5, Artikkel 1169531.en_US
dc.identifier.issn2624-9367
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11250/3098171
dc.descriptionThis is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.en_US
dc.description.abstractUnderpinned by an ecological dynamics rationale, the Learning in Development Research Framework (LDRF) has been suggested to introduce methodological possibilities to investigate and illuminate: (i) socio-cultural constraints within a sports organization or club, and (ii), a research gap on the need for a more contemporary framework to guide reliable ways of conducting investigations and designing practical applications. To provide a strong justification for the nature of the fieldwork and methods adopted, we present insights from a 3-year and 5-month study at a professional football club in Sweden that adapted the framework as a central feature of their Department of Methodology for player development. A phronetic iterative approach was employed to analyze the data. The findings highlight the nature of constraints acting over varied timescales, transcending contexts to manifest in other contexts (e.g., practice task designs), influencing events and experiences. This indicated a need to dampen (using probes) the influence of the pervasive organizational “control over context” approaches that were acting as “sticky” socio-cultural constraints, shaping the intentions (in session design) and attention (during practice and performance) of players and coaches. A practical implication is that the LDRF does not prescribe a universal solution to player development. Rather that it can guide how researchers, practitioners, clubs and organisations could challenge themselves to adapt strategies to design contemporary athlete development frameworks within their ecosystem.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.subjectaffordancesen_US
dc.subjectecological dynamicsen_US
dc.subjectethnographyen_US
dc.subjectskill learningen_US
dc.subjecttalent developmenten_US
dc.titleUtilising the learning in development research framework in a professional youth football cluben_US
dc.typePeer revieweden_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.description.versionpublishedVersionen_US
dc.rights.holder© 2023 O'Sullivan, Vaughan, Rumbold and Davidsen_US
dc.source.pagenumber17en_US
dc.source.volume5en_US
dc.source.journalFrontiers in Sports and Active Livingen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.3389/fspor.2023.1169531
dc.identifier.cristin2162067
dc.description.localcodeInstitutt for idrett og samfunnsvitenskap / Department of Sport and Social Sciencesen_US
dc.source.articlenumber1169531en_US
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.qualitycode1


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail
Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record