Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorWestheim, Frederic
dc.contributor.authorGløersen, Øyvind
dc.contributor.authorHarper, Damian
dc.contributor.authorLaugsand, Håkon Nilsen
dc.contributor.authorEriksrud, Ola
dc.date.accessioned2024-01-05T08:38:52Z
dc.date.available2024-01-05T08:38:52Z
dc.date.created2023-11-09T10:07:54Z
dc.date.issued2023
dc.identifier.citationFrontiers in Sports and Active Living. 2023, 5, Artikkel 1212414.en_US
dc.identifier.issn2624-9367
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11250/3110021
dc.descriptionThis is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.en_US
dc.description.abstractThis study aims to determine test-retest reliability of phase-specific information during initial acceleration, deceleration, and re-acceleration phases of different change-of-direction (CoD) tests using a motorized resistance device (MRD). A total of 21 participants (16 males and five females, with mean age of 22.3 ± 3.9 years, body mass of 75.2 ± 6.9 kg, height of 177.9 ± 6.8 cm) completed the modified 505 (m505), 10-0-5, and 15-0-5 CoD tests on four different test sessions while exposed to an external load (3 kg) provided by the MRD. Outcome variables included overall and phase-specific kinetic (force, power, and impulse) and kinematic (time, distance, velocity, and acceleration/deceleration) data during the initial acceleration, deceleration, and re-acceleration phases. The deceleration and re-acceleration phases were further divided into two subphases, namely, early and late subphases, using 50% of maximum velocity. Reliability was assessed using an intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), coefficient of variation (CV), typical error (TE), and minimal detectable change (MDC). Good to excellent ICC values (>0.75) and acceptable (<10%) to good (<5%) CV values were observed for most outcome measurements. Specifically, 80.1% (822 out of 1,026) of all variables showed good or better relative reliability (i.e., ICC ≥ 0.75), while 97.0% (995 out of 1,026) of all variables showed acceptable or better absolute reliability (i.e., CV < 10%). In conclusion, the present study demonstrates that the MRD can obtain reliable phase-specific outcome measurements across different CoD tests, providing coaches and researchers with new opportunities to advance our understanding of CoD ability and inform more advanced CoD training prescriptions.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.subjectdecelerationen_US
dc.subjectmotorized resistance technologyen_US
dc.subjectphase analysisen_US
dc.subjectre-accelerationen_US
dc.subjectreliabilityen_US
dc.titleReliability of phase-specific outcome measurements in change-of-direction tests using a motorized resistance deviceen_US
dc.typePeer revieweden_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.description.versionpublishedVersionen_US
dc.rights.holder© 2023 Westheim, Gløersen, Harper, Laugsand and Eriksruden_US
dc.source.pagenumber31en_US
dc.source.volume5en_US
dc.source.journalFrontiers in Sports and Active Livingen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.3389/fspor.2023.1212414
dc.identifier.cristin2194397
dc.description.localcodeInstitutt for fysisk prestasjonsevne / Department of Physical Performanceen_US
dc.source.articlenumber1212414en_US
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.qualitycode1


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel