Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorToyooka, Seikai
dc.contributor.authorPersson, Andreas
dc.contributor.authorLaPrade, Robert F.
dc.contributor.authorEngebretsen, Lars
dc.contributor.authorMoatshe, Gilbert
dc.date.accessioned2024-02-09T09:40:59Z
dc.date.available2024-02-09T09:40:59Z
dc.date.created2023-12-07T14:20:20Z
dc.date.issued2023
dc.identifier.citationOrthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine. 2023, 11(8), Artikkel 23259671231184468.en_US
dc.identifier.issn2325-9671
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11250/3116552
dc.descriptionThis open-access article is published and distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution - NonCommercial - No Derivatives License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits the noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction of the article in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. You may not alter, transform, or build upon this article without the permission of the Author(s).en_US
dc.description.abstractBackground: Posterolateral corner (PLC) knee injuries associated with different injury mechanisms are not well known. Purpose/Hypothesis: This study sought to assess the patterns of associated injuries in the setting of PLC injury. The hypothesis was that there are recognizable injury patterns in PLC injuries that may correlate with injury mechanism. Study Design: Cross-sectional study; Level of evidence, 3. Methods: Patients who sustained a multiligament knee injury were retrospectively reviewed. Patients who sustained an acute grade 3 PLC injury and underwent surgery were enrolled in this study. A description of the PLC injury (location of the injury of the fibular collateral ligament [FCL], popliteus tendon, and/or popliteofibular ligament) and reported concomitant injuries (biceps femoris tendon or meniscal tears, cartilage pathology and/or peroneal nerve palsy, or bone bruises) were collected and classified based on intraoperative and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) findings. Results: Of 135 patients reviewed, 83 did not have PLC involvement and 13 were excluded due to insufficient MRI scans available. Thus, 39 patients were included in this study. For both the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL)–PLC and ACL–posterior cruciate ligament–PLC injury patterns, the most frequent injury pattern entailed a bone bruise of the anteromedial (AM) femur and tibia, an FCL tear from the fibular head, the popliteus tendon avulsed off the femur, a biceps femoris tendon torn off the fibular head, and a common peroneal nerve palsy. Conversely, when no bone bruise occurred on the AM femur and tibia, the FCL was injured on the femoral side and the popliteus tendon, biceps femoris, and peroneal nerve were not injured. Conclusion: AM bone bruise was associated with a peroneal nerve injury in almost half of the patients, and peroneal nerve injury was not seen if there was no AM bone bruise.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.subjectkneeen_US
dc.subjectlateral knee ligamentsen_US
dc.subjectligamentsen_US
dc.subjectperoneal nerve injuryen_US
dc.subjectposterolateral knee ligamentsen_US
dc.titleInjury patterns in posterolateral corner knee injuryen_US
dc.typePeer revieweden_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.description.versionpublishedVersionen_US
dc.rights.holder© The Author(s) 2023en_US
dc.source.pagenumber7en_US
dc.source.volume11en_US
dc.source.journalOrthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicineen_US
dc.source.issue8en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1177/23259671231184468
dc.identifier.cristin2210425
dc.description.localcodeInstitutt for idrettsmedisinske fag / Department of Sports Medicineen_US
dc.source.articlenumber23259671231184468en_US
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.qualitycode1


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record